I know you wouldnt Beks... even with all your screwy lib ideas you have a working brain.
Damn, that musta been tough to type Hill
by mtsgrad 89 Replies latest jw friends
I know you wouldnt Beks... even with all your screwy lib ideas you have a working brain.
Damn, that musta been tough to type Hill
Hey, ladies, Sumner Redstone was recently divorced and is available. He's worth about $300 mil.
*Shudders* Yeah, umm I think I'd pass on that one, regardless of any amount of money Gregor, lmao! I like sex, and he would be the death of my sexual desire for life.
I like sex, and he would be the death of my sexual desire for life.
I dunno Sweetstuff, look at those nobby little fingers
I could see a young, attractive woman loving (genuinely) Warren Buffet, even if he is old and isn't the most physically attractive guy (he is kind of cherubic though). Then again, Buffet is one of the coolest people on the planet.
Six...should I expand your idea here? Are you saying that you might switch teams for a guy like Warren Buffet.
As many times as I have taken one "up the chute" for free over the years ... well I bet I could handle one of those old guys for a month or two for $300 million or so....
Hill
The conclusion of the matter all things being heard is Rich men ARE more attractive than Poor men. I have $400 dollars of savings. Anyone wanna bear my kids?
mtsgrad
Let me clarify for you then JD, I love my children unconditionally. And I believe that's how it should be. It sure as hell is often not how it is. But for me, I do love them unconditionally, without reserve and I have absolutely (I'm not one to talk in absolutes about most things) no doubt that will never change. And before you say, it's not possible, that's YOUR reality, we all have our own.
Let's scrutinize this a bit, shall we? When you say "unconditional love," you mean you'll love them regardless of what kind of person they are or who they become or what they do. Logic dictates then, that for every conceivable human action, you would still love them. If they lie, cheat, steal, hate you, try to kill you, do kill you, have sex with animals, are cannabals, like to put razor blades in Halloween candy, want to put you in a torture device and actually do put you in one, have no remorse for anything they do, are arrogant, never wrong, and any other thing that nearly all of us would hold as despicable, you would still love them. All of these things are documented human behavior.
Do you really think you would love them if they were such creatures? You may say your daughters are not all of those things, and I'm sure that's true. But if you're using the fact that they are not those things to justify your unconditional love, your unconditional love isn't so unconditional, is it. In fact, unconditional love, by its very nature, means that its basis has nothing to do with the object of that love. Do you think that's flattering? Do you really think it's even possible?
Love your kids if they try to kill you? What on earth have i started with this thread?
Love your kids if they try to kill you? What on earth have i started with this thread?
ahhh...I like to call it the "ever-expansive thread syndrom"... see we never venture 'off topic" here at JWD... we just "expand"
Whats your favorite cookie recipe?
Hill