by cognac 183 Replies latest jw friends
I think that we should wrap up all of scholar's posts on 607 in a nice big fat envelope and a pretty bow, and send them to Angel Eyes and Cognac's husband.
Nothing else that anybody has ever posted here could possibly convince them as well and as quickly that this whole 607 idea (along with the jabber-wocky derived 1914 et al) is total horse manure.
You too should get real. Because the matter is now in the public domain all the more reason that you should also direct your criticisms to Furuli. Your refusal to do so reveals your true motive is not to educate but to deceive the public. Another piece of apostae mischief making.
Huff and puff. Not interested. Quit deflecting and deal with the hard data I've given you.
Scholar post 1770: "If you have a better proposal then I am open to suggestions."
Billy the Ex-Bethelite has a better proposal. Since Furuli is obviously too busy to post in defense of his own theories here, surely there are other scholars that can be contacted for satisfactory explanations. "Scholar" had earlier provided these names of non-JW scholars that agree with Furuli's 607 calculations:
Jerry Leslie
Julian T Gray
Paul S Johnson
Morton Edgar
Charles f Redeker
Perhaps "scholar" could provide some contact information for these men so that Ann can contact them for information in support of Furuli's ideas.
Billy thinks this is a much better idea than Ann having to waste her time looking for an explanation from just the one man Furuli.
AnnOMaly
Post 1117
You too should get real. Because the matter is now in the public domain all the more reason that you should also direct your criticisms to Furuli. Your refusal to do so reveals your true motive is not to educate but to deceive the public. Another piece of apostae mischief making.
scholar JW
Scholar..
Why just get Furuli`s "uneducated opinion"?..
How about the Guy at the Corner Store?..
Or..
The Telephone Operater?..
Or..
How about the guy that drives the Nieghbourhood Ice Creme Truck?..
Ice Creme Trucks play Music..
Someone that drives an Ice Creme truck,that plays Music..
Must know something about 607!..
..........................OUTLAW
AnnOMaly
Furuli has already dealt with the hard data and his research agrees with the Bible and that is good enough for me. Your so called ;hard data; is simply apostate opinion and I have no interest in your opinion.
scholar JW
scholar,
How are you coming on that contact list of non-JW scholars' that accept Furuli's "hard data and research"?
Another piece of apostae mischief making.
--Don't you just love it when a substantive observation is met with the vilest pejorative in the JW vernacular? How can anyone take this seriously?
It seems the Watchtower Society does not agree with God. Insight on the Scriptures Vol.1 page 332 they say God for told the Jewish Captives "they would have to serve the King of Babylon seventy years, after which he would deliver a faithful remnant." (Jer. 25:11-12) The next paragraph says "Even BEFORE the end of the 70 years of exile, Babylon fell, in 539 B.C.E. to the armies of Persian King Cyrus. But then if you go to page 431 under MORDECAI, they say He was one who returned to Jerusalem and Judah in 537 B.C.E. AFTER THE 70 YEARS OF EXILE IN BABYLON.
Furuli has already dealt with the hard data and his research agrees with the Bible and that is good enough for me. Your so called ;hard data; is simply apostate opinion and I have no interest in your opinion.
Furuli's data is frequently incorrect. My opinion? What are you talking about? Are astronomy programs apostate now, hey Neil?
AnnOMaly
Post 1123
It is simply your opinion that Furuli's data is incorrect. Astronomy programs are not apostate but the interpretation and application of those programs is sullied by apostates who have an agenda.
scholar JW
