100 Million Americans Question Official 911 Story

by sammielee24 217 Replies latest members politics

  • drwtsn32
    drwtsn32

    Conspiracies are sometimes true ... fact.

    Bearing that has on whether 9/11 is a gov't coverup ... none.

  • sammielee24
    sammielee24

    History has a way of repeating itself - sometimes. No? If these things happened but the voices that questioned were continually silenced, then what makes a person so blind they can't believe it might happen again? I find that kind of mindset interesting. I personally don't think some skepticism is a bad thing - many people who try to find answers to their questions and who might suggest alternate points of view, somehow get relegated to 'propaganda' machines. Interesting that - sammieswife.

    --------------

    Operation Mockingbird: Also in the 1950s to ’70s, the CIA paid a number of well-known domestic and foreign journalists (from big-name media outlets like Time, The Washington Post, The New York Times, CBS and others) to publish CIA propaganda. The CIA also reportedly funded at least one movie, the animated “Animal Farm,” by George Orwell. The Church Committee finally exposed the activities in 1975.

    Manhattan Project: The Manhattan Project was the codename for a project conducted during World War II to develop the first atomic bomb. The project was led by the United States, and included participation from the United Kingdom and Canada. Formally designated as the Manhattan Engineer District (MED), it refers specifically to the period of the project from 1942–1946 under the control of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, under the administration of General Leslie R. Groves. The scientific research was directed by American physicist J. Robert Oppenheimer. The project’s roots lay in scientists’ fears since the 1930s that Nazi Germany was also investigating nuclear weapons of its own. Born out of a small research program in 1939, the Manhattan Project eventually employed more than 130,000 people and cost nearly US$2 billion ($22 billion in current value). It resulted in the creation of multiple production and research sites that operated in secret. With the total involved, this makes it one of the largest conspiracies in history. Entire towns were built for short periods of time, employing people, all under secrecy and top national secrecy at that. The government never admitted to it, the media never reported on it, and people had no idea for over 25 years. Project research took place at over thirty sites across the United States, Canada, and the United Kingdom. The three primary research and production sites of the project were the plutonium-production facility at what is now the Hanford Site, the uranium-enrichment facilities at Oak Ridge, Tennessee, and the weapons research and design laboratory now known as Los Alamos National Laboratory. The MED maintained control over U.S. weapons production until the formation of the Atomic Energy Commission in January 1947.

    Asbestos: Between 1930 and 1960, manufacturers did all they could to prevent the link between asbestos and respiratory diseases, including cancer, becoming known, so they could avoid prosecution. American workers had in fact sued the Johns Manville company as far back as 1932, but it was not until 1962 that epidemiologists finally established beyond any doubt what company bosses had known for a long time – asbestos causes cancer.

    Operation Northwoods: In the early 1960s, American military leaders drafted plans to create public support for a war against Cuba, to oust Fidel Castro from power. The plans included committing acts of terrorism in U.S. cities, killing innocent people and U.S. soldiers, blowing up a U.S. ship, assassinating Cuban émigrés, sinking boats of Cuban refugees, and hijacking planes. The plans were all approved by the Joint Chiefs of Staff, but were reportedly rejected by the civilian leadership, then kept secret for nearly 40 years.

    Author James Bamford, “A Pretext For War”, discusses the declassified “Operation Northwoods” documents revealing that in 1962 the CIA was planning to stage phony terrorist attacks on the US and blame it on Cuba to start a war:

  • sir82
    sir82
    It's like the moon landing deniers
    the logic is flawed

    Wait...what?

    People were on the moon?

    Oh sure, next you'll tell me an eclipse isn't really a giant dragon swallowing the sun.

  • JWoods
    JWoods
    Bearing that has on whether 9/11 is a gov't coverup ... none.

    Those four examples mentioned also are an argument that legitimate and real conspiracies are VERY difficult to keep secret. Which is one of the strongest arguments against the 9/11 conspiracty theories.

  • DaCheech
    DaCheech

    "100 million".............. reminds me of "millions now living will may never die"

  • sammielee24
    sammielee24

    Well, since I don't contend to be a conspiracy theorists myself - I post those examples for those who proclaim that 9/11 cannot be. Some of these factual examples took 40 years to uncover and a lot of people were flamed in the interim - all that we think we know we really don't.

    I'm not the firefighter in the building at the time, I'm not the architect or engineer who with the knowledge, I'm not the eye witness or worker inside the building, I'm not the first responder or the guy with the camera - I'm not the committee member or politician that now questions the validity of all the report. So now what? The government sets up a committee to investigate and the report offered to the world is now considered untrue? Proof? What can be added to this to make it true? Nothing unless another full scale investigation is done. So why would anyone logically, assume that any single person who believes that there was a cover up, be a nut job or why would they be labelled a conspiracy theorist? If the government paid for and sanctioned report is a lie - then you don't know the truth. Plain and simple. sammieswife.

    ======

    n 2006, The Washington Post reported…”Suspicion of wrongdoing ran so deep that the 10-member commission, in a secret meeting at the end of its tenure in summer 2004, debated referring the matter to the Justice Department for criminal investigation, according to several commission sources. Staff members and some commissioners thought that e-mails and other evidence provided enough probable cause to believe that military and aviation officials violated the law by making false statements to Congress and to the commission…”

    (CINCINNATI, Ohio) – In John Farmer’s book: “The Ground Truth: The Story Behind America’s Defense on 9/11″, the author builds the inescapably convincing case that the official version… is almost entirely untrue…

    The 9/11 Commission now tells us that the official version of 9/11 was based on false testimony and documents and is almost entirely untrue. The details of this massive cover-up are carefully outlined in a book by John Farmer, who was the Senior Counsel for the 9/11 Commission.

    Farmer, Dean of Rutger Universities’ School of Law and former Attorney General of New Jersey, was responsible for drafting the original flawed 9/11 report.

    Does Farmer have cooperation and agreement from other members of the Commission? Yes. Did they say Bush ordered 9/11? No. Do they say that the 9/11 Commission was lied to by the FBI, CIA, Whitehouse and NORAD? Yes. Is there full documentary proof of this? Yes.

    Farmer states…“at some level of the government, at some point in time…there was an agreement not to tell the truth about what happened… I was shocked at how different the truth was from the way it was described …. The [Norad air defense] tapes told a radically different story from what had been told to us and the public for two years. This is not spin.”

    The 9/11 Commission head, Thomas Kean, was the Republican governor of New Jersey. He had the following to say… “We to this day don’t know why NORAD [the North American Aerospace Command] told us what they told us, it was just so far from the truth. . . ” When Bush’s own handpicked commission failed to go along with the cover up and requested a criminal investigation, why was nothing done?

    9/11 Commission member and former US Senator, Bob Kerrey, says, “No one is more qualified to write the definitive book about the tragedy of 9/11 than John Farmer. Fortunately, he has done so. Even more fortunately the language is clear, alive and instructive for anyone who wants to make certain this never happens again.”

    With the only “official” 9/11 report now totally false, where do we go from here? Who is hurt by these lies? The families of the victims of 9/11 have fought, for years, to get to the truth. For years, our government has hidden behind lies and secrecy to deny them closure.

    What does Farmer’s book tell us? Farmer offers no solutions, only a total and full rejection of what was told and his own his own ideas concerning the total failure of honesty on the part of the government, a government with something to hide.

    Farmer never tells us what. Nobody could keep a job in the public sector speaking out more than Farmer has. What were Farmer’s omissions? There are some. Now that we know that intelligence given the 9/11 Commission wasn’t just lies from our own government but based on testimony coerced through torture from informants forced to back up a cover story now proven false, a pattern emerges.

    We know that, immediately after 9/11, many more potential suspects and informants were flown directly to Saudi Arabia by Presidential order than were ever detained and questioned. We will never know what they could have said. Their testimony would have been vital to any real investigation were they not put beyond the reach of even Congress and the FBI.

    Putting aside all other questions of recent evidence of CIA involvement with bin Laden prior to 9/11 or altered physical evidence involving the Pentagon attack, any failure to call to account the systematic perjury committed by dozens of top government officials, now exposed as a certainty is an offense to every American.

    What do we know? We know the conjecture about 9/11 still stands but for certain, we know we were lied to, not in a minor way, but systematically as part of a plot covering up government involvement at nearly every level, perhaps gross negligence, perhaps something with darker intent.

    Are we willing to live with another lie to go with the Warren Report, Iran Contra and so many others? Has the sacrifice of thousands more Americans, killed, wounded or irreparably damaged by a war knowingly built on the same lies from the same liars who misled the 9/11 Commission pushed us beyond willingness to confront the truth?

    Have we yet found where the lies have begun and ended? There is no evidence of this, only evidence to the contrary. The lies live on and the truth will never be sought. The courage for that task has not been found.

    Can anyone call themselves an American if they don’t demand, even with the last drop of their blood, that the truth be found?

    How long have we watered the Tree of Deceit with the blood of patriots?

  • drwtsn32
    drwtsn32
    History has a way of repeating itself - sometimes. No? If these things happened but the voices that questioned were continually silenced, then what makes a person so blind they can't believe it might happen again?

    So people who don't buy into the coverup stories are blind? And they believe conspiracies will never happen again? Umm...no.

    Sure it is possible for a gov't conspiracy to happen. It has happened in the past and will undoubtedly happen in the future. But that alone is not evidence for 9/11 being a conspiracy. If you want to call me and others "blind" because we won't accept it until actual objective evidence is presented, so be it.

  • JWoods
    JWoods
    Well, since I don't contend to be a conspiracy theorists myself - I post those examples for those who proclaim that 9/11 cannot be.

    Well, you had me fooled - could have sworn you believed in a 9/11 conspiracy by the government. You have posted on this before.

    Same thing going on with the fluoride in water deal?

  • bohm
    bohm

    This is how a 9-11 truther argues: They assert they are right. Then the say others think they are right to. Then they say that some people has been right about unrelated matter in the past and therefore they are right. Then they say you are stupid and close-minded because you do not say they are right.

    Facts does not enter at all. This is page 4 and i am still asking for one single piece of evidence that 9-11 was not caused by airplanes and terrorists. None has been produced. Sammie, do you really want me to believe that you have checked this out when you cant re-produce any of the evidence that swayed you? Conspiracy theorist have no shame of the men and women who died, of the men and women who they accuse of murder and treason.

  • bohm
    bohm

    Sammie, the whole post you wrote is just a mix of the brainless statement "absence of evidence does not mean we are wrong" and a list of people who agree with you: no evidence. apparently the 'truth' is best found without.

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit