Mad Sweeney:
I know, I know. I really have no problem calling the WTBTS, the Mormons, Scientology, Christian Scientists, the Freemasonry or the Rosicrucians cults. Heck, I believe that if we go by the sociological definition of cult, the good ol' Catholic mother church is a cult. I mean (this if for you skeeter1) the Pope speaks for God and is indeed the ultimate authority down to whether you should wear a condom or not. And, although not commonly used, they do have excommunication and can tell their clergy or laity to “shut up and sit down” or get out. But alas, nobody in the media or scholastic circles calls them a cult. When I used to go door to door in Field Service, I often encountered individuals who would assure me that they were born Catholic, raised Catholic and would always be Catholic, even if I proved to them that Mary was not always a virgin and that the Church lied.
If heads are rolling in the Catholic hierarchy these days, it's not for lack of trying to cover up all the decades of child abuse. The cat is out of the bag because people talked and the media listened and lawsuits were served. The result is a more accurate representation of the Church beyond their pious squeaky-clean image. So, it doesn't really matter if they're a cult or not as long as the truth is out. I just thought that if some people “in the know” think that the WTBTS is not a cult, we could talk about the JWS in the proper context, i.e. major religions like it are very f***ed up judging from what they do, instead of dismissing them as just another “cult”. I mean, I want to get at those bastards, not because of what they did to me (I'm very OK now), but because they're still keeping my family hostage. I want to do it intelligently and reasonably, taking into account a complete view of the world towards them. Am I being a bit anal about this? Maybe I'm just putting too fine a point on it.
Etude