Terry, may I ask why you choose to focus on God as being a God of justice? He is a God of mercy. If he wasn't, well, we probably wouldn't still be here.
Tammy, stop and think about it.
There is a basis for what happens throughout the universe. It is cause and effect. Endless cause and effect.
Now pause a moment.
IF God is the source of all other things (not being self-created) He is the FIRST cause leading to all subsequent causes and effects.
On what basis does God operate if not one of balance?
JUSTICE is a restorative balance between cause and effect. IF this.....THEN that... .
Justice is: getting what you deserve (due to what you've done) and NOT getting what you don't deserve. (Unearned rewards).
Name one deed prior to Jesus Christ whereby God did not operate out of the foundation of JUSTICE?
What is the covenant between God and Israel all about if not redressing the imbalance between deed and consequence according to God's standard of what is just?
That is the huge flaw in the concocted Jesus story which violates Justice and turns it inside out.
Jesus clearly is without sin. He did not CAUSE a wrongful act and does not DESERVE a wrongful consequence.
Where does the GRACE doctrine rest in terms of JUSTness?
Those who have earned death by wrongful deeds (humans cause harm) suddenly do not earn the natural consequences! (God's kindness is clearly stated to be "undeserved"!)
JUSTICE--having always been the basis of God's dealings is violated!
God is the same yesterday, today and forever---we are told, and yet---the God of Jesus is the polar opposite of Justice!!
Also, I disagree that the basis for love is value. I know others share it, but it seems cold and legalistic and tit for tat to me, which just seems like a business exchange and not unselfish - love to me should be about giving, not about gaining.
Tammy
Okay, Tammy. What are you left with? An uncaused emotion? The strongest possible emotion without a basis? Emotions are the EFFECT of an internal CAUSE.
What you value is your appraisal of things as they are as to the scale of excellence all the way over to worthless and destructive.
To LOVE is to recognize within somebody or some thing the embodiment of what you appraise as excellent.
To love is to assign merit.
If we, then, love what is not worth loving we diminsh ourselves because a person is the essence of what they love.
It is a grading scale within attributing VALUE based on your personal and individual consciousness as the person you are.
No two people grade the same way, do they?
I love apricot pie and and somebody else like Rhubarb.
I like short brunettes and somebody else likes tall blondes.
I love Rachmaninoff's piano concertos while others may prefer Pink Floyd.
The evaluation (values) trigger the emotional reactions!
To the BELIEVER, then, God is the source of all actual VALUES.
God's love must then follow the course of echoing God's valuation as to the scale between excellent perfect all the way over to repugnant destruction.
Does this not make perfect sense? What can be "cold" about understanding the source of our emotions?
Emotions are never a SOURCE of comprehension. They are the reaction to our values.
Once you understand your own values you will understand your emotions.
love to me should be about giving, not about gaining.
This is like saying the economy should be based on payments and not receivables.
Where is the balance that enables payments to be made FROM receivables with a profit left over?
You must earn a living to be able to pay your bills, but, if you only earn enough to pay bills without anything left over
you are a wage slave and your life is unsuccessful due to debt burden.
THINK ABOUT IT: a person who doesn't understand that we EARN the success we live with by applying a balance between
earning/spending is doomed to unsuccess and quickly becomes dependant and a burden to others.
By saying LOVE should be about giving is to say there is no balance to the greatest value in life!
It is a violation of cause and effect by which the universe operates!
We have been taught (in our Western society) that it is more "blessed" to give than to receive without first building a foundational understanding
of balance between giving and receiving.
Psychiatrists constantly counsel battered wives and dysfunctional familes not to become ENABLERS to toxic members by giving and loving which feeds the destructive behaviors of others.
This is that rift: the imbalance between acting on a value and simply blindly operating without cause.