No, I am saying that mankind has not as of yet come to know all there is to know about everything in the universe including the laws of physics. I keep an open mind on science because in my lifetime what science taught in my childhood is not exactly what it teaches today and that's good but it does mean that science is discovering the world through a process not an absolute.
Not exactly, no - but the fundamentals of electromagnatism have not been elimintated. What was understood about electricity 50 years ago is pretty damn close to what we understand today - just instead of science saying "10.521" it says "10.5214693684...". While Newton's laws of motion still hold true - in large gravitational systems such as the planetary bodies Einstein's Theory of Relativity expands upon it to explain why the orbit of Mars drifts year to year. What significant differences have you observed?
If I were to say to you "There is a million dollar prize for anyone who can identify ???: "1, 2, 3, 4, 5, ???, 7, 8, 9, 10".. You'd be a fool to say anything but '6'. The human brain is well adapted at pattern matching. It is basically all our brain really does. Whereas a silicon machine is fundamentally an adding machine - a neural network is at it's core a pattern matching machine.
So when we identify 300 fossils that indicate evolution, filling in the blanks is something we are well adapted to do. Keeping an open mind is good - but if science can make positive predictions in mathmatics, archeology, in the laws of motion, chemistry, biology, biochemistry, etc., etc... One starts to see a pattern - 1, 2, 3, 4... It is not absolutely certain that the 6'th digit is '6' - but it is a damn good bet.
Just because we do not know EVERYTHING (which we never will), doesn't mean we don't know ANYTHING.
- Lime