I don't know. Global warming might be a fraud. Its validity is up in the air right now, and that would be a case of science being wrong. Dogs see more than in black and white, contrary to what science once said. Women are not less intelligent than men - scientists once said that, yes? (and no, that is not up for debate ) Sharks were thought as man-eaters once, we now know that we are the least tasty of all their prey. Big bang is accepted by some and argued by others. When science proves something, it might not be wrong, but scientific theories are often wrong - or at least not fully explored yet.
I have no problem with evolution. Or with the long age of the earth. There could be mistakes, something in the science that was overlooked, regarding carbon dating and such - but unless that is proven, then I'll go with what the scientific facts say. Doesn't affect my faith in any way at all. The flood could have been a localized flood, and written in accordance with the perceptions of the people at the time. Or it could have been worldwide, and science has not yet discovered the proof of that. Again, makes no difference to my faith either way.
Its hard for me to agree or disagree with science, CJ, because most of it is out of my realm of knowledge. But I keep an open mind, either way, because I don't understand all the backs that have been stood on to get to where we are, and I usually like to know every detail before I am comfortable fully accepting a theory or 'fact'.
Tammy