scholar moaned: Well Furuli made a 'hands on ' examination accompanied by a detailed translation of the tablet and detailed photography which was enough to convince him of this hypothesis.
Oh please. An ant crawling across the tablet would have been "enough to convince him of this hypothesis" because Furuli has an agenda and most certainly has not approached the subject from an unbiased point of view. He's out to try and 'prove' that the first temple fell in 607 BCE, end of story.
Furuli, the 'celebrated WT scholars and the said 'scholar' do not need this tablet for the support or non-support of our chronology.
LMAO! Of course he does you moron and you know it. Furuli is well aware of the fact that there is absolutely no historical, archaeological or biblical evidence that Jerusalem was first destroyed in 607 BCE and he knows full well that without that pivitol date, the date of 1914---which is the center of the universe in Dub-dumb Land----disappears as having any biblical significance. Worse, it demolishes the Governing Body's crazy theory that they were chosen as the "Faithful and Discreet Slave" in 1918 and that is something they will never concede to.
Our wondrous Bible chronology can stand on its own and does not need the whimsical interpretations of modern scholarship.
Ah, finally grasping at a bit or truth here. You're absolutely right on that point pseudo-scholar. As you are well aware, it has been demonstrated on this board time and time again that by using bible chronology by itself, it's easy to prove that the first temple fell in 586/587 BCE and not 607 BCE:
You say that there is no evidence of tampering: well you are not a scholar and your opinion counts for nothing.
And your opinion counts for---what? Anything? I never said I was a scholar but I can certainly read, write, reason and think and base my opinion on that. In case you haven't noticed dimwit---this is a discussion board where we all give our 'opinions'. Is that really so difficult for you to comprehend?
All that you are doing is simply blindly following your masters, Jonsson, Hunger and others.
Yes, I have statues of these guy set up as a shrine in my livingroom. Every morning I sacrifice lambs or goats to them before I prostrate myself before them hoping they approve of my 'blind' worship of them. 
Hunger, Jonsson and Gallagher have everything to lose if Furuli is correct and only time and further research will prove the matter one way or the other.
You already said that and I already replied. Are you getting dementia? What are you going to do when they prove Furuli wrong? Lemme guess: You'll ignore the proof and continue to rant about 'celebrated WT scholars' and how much smarter they are than the rest of the world. 
The evidence for 607 BCE is sufficiently based on the Bible so we have nothing at all to worry about.
Sure it is scholar. That's why you've been posting your crap for the last decade because you've "got nothing to worry about". The real question is: do you count all of us as bible studies or just Return Visits on your Field Serve-Us Report?
