I try my best, as you know, I try my best.
I do, dear one (again, peace to you!)
May I ask why Jaheshua instead of Yeshua ? and how is it pronunced phonetically?
My understanding is that "Jah eShua" is accurate. "Yeshua" removes the name of the Father, which certain men decided was too sacred to utter. Thus, they say "Yeshua" instead of "Y eShua"... instead of "Yah eShua". The yodh, however, is not the "y" men erroneously think it is - it is a "j"... which is pronounced like the consonant "y" (versus the vowel "y"). The only reason I know how it is pronounced is because that is how he said it to me at first and says it to me since. Jah eShua. Pronounced "Yah esh ua" or "Yah eh shua".
I know that Hebrew linguists have issues with Yahshua but I don't think thay have it with Yaheshua nor Yeshua or Yehoshua.
Look at the last three here:
Yaheshua - This is exactly what I am saying, unless you place emphasis on the "h" (i.e., Ya Heh Shua). You don't. The empahsis is on the "e" ("Yah eh shua"). And if you to believe the yodh to be a "y"... which it isn't (it's a "j").
Yeshua - The second is as I've explained above - there is a syllable missing ("Yah").
Yehoshua - The last is least correct because it reverses the SOUND of the first two vowels (i.e., Yoheshua... Yoh eshua, pronounced "Yah eshua"... and NOT Yehoshua, pronounced "Ye ho shua").
I know that in Hebrew annointed one is mashiakha and so annoited of Yah ( Jah) would be mashiakhaJah or mashiakhaYah.
My understanding from our Lord is that "anointed (chosen) of JAH is "mischa Jah." I think maybe the... well, I don't even know what to call the phlegmy throaty Hebrew "thing"... is the problem. When one says "Mischa" correctly, it DOES sound like there might be a "k", indeed, a "kha" sound in there.
Is the rendering you use of Jaheshua Mischajah a "phonetic" one?
It IS!! Because it existed before there were symbols to symbolize it. BUT... according to my Lord, JAHESHUA MISCHAJAH (the caps are mine) are the accurate symbols.
AGuest- I can respect your somewhat non-pretentious approach
Thank you, dear Jay, and peace to you! Truly, because there are MANY here who would disagree that my approach is "non-pretentious." LOLOLOL! But truly it is - I mean absolutely NO pretention at all!
but I think that you really enjoy the taste of your own cooking very much.
Well, yeah, I mean, I can cook when I want to. And sometimes it's tasty. But, I mean, I'm the first to admit I'm no Paula Dean...
And I know you will grant what you are who you are as the outcome of spirit that has been granted you---I am happy for you.
Thank you! I think...
Imo, you sound like a person who has been abducted by aliens and is sharing with us some elaborate story about your time with the abductor.---Again good for you!
Yeah, I can see how one might think that. Not true, but I can understand it...
Are you not willing to allow people to come into their own, without the (I am saved, and you can, and should be saved too attitude.)
I absolutely am... and I truly don't have the attitude you state here. First, my post is directed to those who are already of the Household of God, Israel, and those who go with, and thus have already "come into their own." In that regard, I am not trying to convert or save anyone. Second, if I were alreayd saved, there would be no NEED for me to post ANY of this, would there? I mean, the tribulation has not even started, let alone any having come through it (saved). Which prompts me to ask: are you... and such others... not willing to let me save me and my household? I mean, you've got to do... or not do... what you believe is best for you and yours, right? Why not allow me the same freedom?
I will give you the benefit of the doubt that perhaps you haven't been posting here that long. I could be wrong as many lurk and others use several different avatars in order to try and hide (though why I truly do not know). But if you would be so kind as to give ME the same benefit of the doubt, you might allow yourself to see that what I post has much less to do with you and people coming into anything at all... and more to do with me and mine coming into something wonderful: life.
Perhaps you'll disagree, but I don't think that's much to ask. When I start a thread like this, it's directed to the Household of God, Israel, and those who go with. And of those, to those with ears to hear. If one does not fall into either of these categories, then one shouldn't take offense. That, IMHO, would be pretentiousness in that such one is assuming they are among those being addressed... when they are not.
I hope this helps you understand a little better, dear Jay, and I thank you for your kind words.
Your servant and a slave of Christ,
SA