Dave,
Thanks for your note. I remember stating to you once that I don't feel that I am the most popular poster here but that doesn’t mean that I am interested in making enemies, either. Like you, I am here only to further my own understanding of JW-related issues post my involvement with the Organization and maybe help a couple of others along the way.
I understand your interest in giving people the benefit of the doubt and so do I. In the matter of Danni it applies to Danni as well as the elders she talked to. Because they are part of a religious system that I don't care for doesn't meant they as individuals are unworthy of the same consideration. That was the only thing that drove me (and others) to respond as we did to Danni's account of her and Darryl's visit to the Hall. Why give her all the benefit of the doubt and the elders none, especially since they had no one speaking their side of the story? No matter how I feel about the WTS, the men, the people, are worthy of basic decency and common courtesy and they will ALWAYS get that from *me*.
You said: My life is not all about winning but more abut understanding. Sometimes that leads me into a situation where I came to a wrong conclusion. I can deal with that and it does not change who I am or lower my level of intelligence, it only proves that I do not know everything about everything. I am fine with that.
I can only agree wholeheartedly with that statement. I think the problem that rears its head (with decreasing frequency, thankfully) here on this forum is that some *do* feel that they have all the answers to every question and those who have a different viewpoint or hold a dissenting opinion are ridiculed, called names, etc.
If there is a common thread to be found in my posting since last March, it is my strong stand against such elitism, judgmentalism and intolerance. I've lived too long under that type of oppressive atmosphere to tolerate a second of it now. It's not about being right, winning arguments or being able to tell someone "I told you so." It's about being able, on a discussion board, to have the freedom to offer your opinion and have it accepted (if not agreed with) without having your intellect and heritage called into question or being called silly names by adults who should know better. Not all agree with what Danni said or did, and we were well within our rights to hold the views we held.
Making friends is fine—I could always use a couple more myself—but my experience as a Witness taught me that friendships based on anything other than mutual respect and unconditional love (despite serious differences of opinion) are worthless. Like anyone, I'd prefer to be well-liked and respected, but I've stepped on some toes since my arrival, particularly since "riz vs JanH." Some of what I've posted could have been said better—perhaps I even could have/should have been more deferential to JW.com's "better posters"—but at the same time others could have used a different approach as well. I have very few regrets in anything I've posted; I've been honest and that's more important to me than a host of cyber friends. The handfull of friends I have made are of the priceless variety and I'd rather have one or two of those than bagfuls of the other.
As far as Alan is concerned, my respect for the man has grown but he was out of line in what he said to me here. I understand he's your friend and imo his bias was showing. If he wants to make amends, that's up to him, but there was no call for him to say what he said. Still, I have no problem with him. He was wrong and I can live with that.
Peace,
tj