I see the same thing with Sab's poker story. He is predisposed to conclude it was a sign from something supernatural. But likely wouldn't have come to that conclusion if he wasn't, at least subconsciously, "looking" for it.
I'm afraid I must agree with you, unshackled. Coincidences are remarkable enough even to those who are predisposed to form other conclusions. All of which to say, we all seek to conclude something about our experiences on the basis of what we are predisposed to believe.
This is not an equitable analogy (though I'm sure you have others, but I see this one a lot). Someone has to win the lottery, and each person (according to the amount of tickets they play vs. are bought) has an equal chance. There is more to Sab's experience than that, regardless of coincidence or meaning.
Hey Tammy. LTNS. Yes, it is an inequitable analogy but only because the odds of winning the lottery are greater than what sab experienced. The odds of what he describes are quite small. I'm not going to try to crunch the numbers but probably in the area of 10 times less likely than choosing 6 lottery numbers out of 49. Still doesn't make it a miracle, though.