In the spirit of evidence collecting, i think materialists should ask a lot more questions before making judgements.
Wise and equitable observation. If someone, including a scientist, makes an assertion on the basis that he just knows it to be true, and offers no evidence for his assertion, I would certainly typify that someone as a fundamentalist. But I don't see that as being the case, here. Sab described an experience he could not explain and explanations were offered that do not support it being a religious experience. That those explanations are rejected out of hand by people who just know that the experience was religious, but those same people offer no other explanation for it having happened other than the mystical is, to me, a far stronger indication of fundamentalist belief.
Time for dinner. Interesting dialogue.