@free2beme:
So we were all taught basically this thought. The Soul is our life, not [separate] and not something that moves on when we die, right? Yet, for those who die and get [resurrected], Jehovah remembers them and makes them come to life with their memories, personalities, appearance and so on, right? Where is all this stored? Does Jehovah have a super computer with files labeled with people's name and life history to reboot?
I thought you were supposed to disassociate yourself with what things you may have learned during the time that you formerly associated with Jehovah's Witnesses. (I'm assuming here that you are no longer one of Jehovah's Witnesses.) That being said, what difference does it make what you believe the soul to be when compared to what you may have learned it to be when you used to associate with Jehovah's Witnesses?
I believe @factfinder's response to your question to be a rather good one, but I wanted to say in response that Jehovah is almighty, period. If man can make a super computer, it pales in significance to Jehovah's memory, which is where every human being that has ever lived on earth is stored, excepting, of course, those that are now in Gehenna, having been erased from His memory. Perhaps if you could conceive of what it really means for someone to be "almighty," this would make what I just said here more understandable, but I suspect such a concept may be above your pay grade. This is not a slight, mind you, but an observation based on your question you asked here as to whether it might be possible that God stores people's names and life histories away in a "super computer" of some sort.
What is that file called, as it seems to sound a whole lot like some sort of [separation] from the physical body that withered away in the ground. Something is there, and even Jehovah's Witnesses can not explain that in their beliefs.
That is where you are mistaken. Jehovah's Witnesses can explain their beliefs, but this belief (in the soul being something separate from the physical body) isn't one of them.
@factfinder:
I could not have spelled out all of what you did in your post is such a concise fashion. I'm pretty sure my post would have been three paragraphs longer (minimum). <g>
@djeggnog