My generalization is based of my observations, and my observations are subject to human limitations.
Take Richard Dawkins, for example. His passion is finding answers and he finds them and his work is impressive, but I find him unimaginative. He finds answers, much like the answer to a math equation; cold and abstract.
Evolution has already been proven so his campaign for adding to the mountain of evidence could be considered moot. Science, for me, sparks wild imagination. I am very much like the atheists I have come across with the exception that I believe in God. I think there might be a connection.
You're talking about a SCIENTIST, doing his JOB! Which is SCIENCE! You know him ONLY from his WORKING LIFE! You have no idea what he is like during off hours. What you're doing is as dumb as complaining that mathematicians are all emotionless, unimaginitive wasters because when they're doing maths equations they rely on cold hard logical accuracy.
Give the world a fucking break dude.
ALSO, Richard Dawkins is NOT a typical atheist because he is a famous scientist, most atheists are neither famous nor scientists.
Move along.