@PSacramento, that first paragraph was meant for you, the rest for TimothyT.
What I was trying to say is that Jesus himself said that he was not going to change the law as it was written. The law against homosexuality thus stands in Christianity (and that's what Paul wrote as well) ergo why try to attain to a teaching you know by your own person cannot be true of a loving God. I hate the apologetics that you can't take the bible literal or you have to interpret it differently. As the Bible shows: ALL scriptures are inspired (by an all-knowing, loving God) ergo ALL scriptures must be true, loving and up-to-date. If it's just a book of stories, why base your life around mythological figures, you might as well believe in an Invisible Pink Unicorn or a Flying Spaghetti Monster, Zeus, Brahma, ...
The Asian and other (newer and older) religions don't have anything against homosexuals, only the Abrahamic religions do.
The comment about Lot was my interpretation of how the story got there. You've got a dude living in a city known for it's gay people (all gay people got lovingly destroyed by God), he doesn't want to leave, he is forced to leave, his wife was never there or mysteriously disappears (the salt pillar comes as the story gets re-told and kids ask "what about his wife") he screws his daughters and is very upset about it (and from the scriptures and history it seems screwing kids for survival back then was common as the Mosaic Law talks about it). Make him a homosexual and see whether or not this story fits better with the facts of not having a wife and living in a city full of gay people.
Sorry if I offend anyone using the word gay. I'm not against any lifestyle, I always felt I could not be against it even when I was a good dub.