I do like you Abaddon.
I have no opinion of you in that regard at this time, in fact no opinion of you at all other than on your tendancy to believe unsubstansiated rumour, but that wouldn't stop me liking you if I liked you as a person.
I do love to... catch ya.... Hahahahahaha…Try getting up a geological era earlier... Hahahahahahaha
If I'm not mistaken, you do believe in... an evolution. Right?An evolution of what... oh, evolution, yes, yes, get on with your point...
I want to see one piece of evidence of it!Okay, here's some observed instances of speciation (one species developing into another, sometimes called microevolution);
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/faq-speciation.html
And here's some more;
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/speciation.html
And here's information about the transitional (fossils that show signs of say, reptilain AND amphibian features, sometimes called macroevolution) that creationists say don't exist;
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/comdesc/
And some more information about transitional fossils;
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/faq-transitional.html
There is plenty more, and not just at the one website I quote above. Universities, Museums, Libraries, Bookshops. Loads of evidence that point toward an evolutionary origin.
I want to make own experiment and create life as well, as evolution can.And (from later in your post);Any idea how to do it and... prove it?
I want PROOF, HARD SOLID EVIDENCE! You are good at it!!!! I trust you on that onePlease define 'create life'. I can do that having sex with my girlfriend. I assume the same option (whether you are a boy or girl) is open to you and that you have some other definiton in mind.
Anyone has created life? Single cell? Single organism?
Bear in mind experimental times for experiments involving generating life from organic molecules would be rather large, and do involve some speculation as to exact conditions.
Please realise that not being able to create life in a test-tube is not a proof that it cannot be done, or that evolution as a general theory of origin is wrong, for the following reasons;
1/ Required timescale of experiments; no one is saying life is being created everyday, so not being able to do it is no surprise.
2/ Exact conditions are uncertain at this time
3/ We are here, so life must have come into being somehow
4/ We can find no evidence for any other origin other than that which is explained by the theory of evolution
Thus your.... attempt... to 'catch me' fails;
1/ You fail to prove something which you say is happening right now
2/ This is despite being fairly certain of the circumstance it happens under.
3/ Aliens are not here (as in plain view), so their existance must be proved rather than assumed.
4/ You have no evidence, and you cannot show what you say is true by arranged demonstration (just like the demon believers).
I cannot make life in a test-tube, but can produce large buildings in most countries in the world that contain room after room, shelf after shelf of evidence that fits in with the general theory of evolution; obviously there is dispute and refinement of detail, but evolution is a new science, and this is understandable.
For example, last week they announced the discovery of the genetic switch which lead to insects developing forms where not ever segment has legs (like flies) from forms where every segment had legs (like centipedes), WITH EXPERIMENTAL PROOF.
Thus you try to compare chall and cheese, and make a mess of the blackboard and leave a bad taste in your mouth.
Oh, and don't try the 'UFOolgy is a new science thing'; it's not a science, it hasn't got any facts (other than UFOologists have no evidence).
I do find it funny you immediately seek to attack my beliefs rather than defending the facts you presented. Oh. You didn't have any.
You seems to know a lot about scientific evidences:No more than anyone with three years at University doing sciences and an avid life-long interest in science. I'm exactly average for someone like that.
You quote my suggested experiment and respond with;
I would not accept any explanation kind of: so many scientists are accepting is.I assume English is not your native language, as your grammar is a bit off (although you do better than I could in Dutch, which I am learning), but I think I understand you to mean;
'I wouldn't accept that (what light the plant absorbs most of) as an explaination; many scientists are too accepting of things like this'
Please correct me if I have misunderstood you.
All I can say is you have NO IDEA of scientific methodology. So, if the plant under the green light grows the least, and the plants under the blue and red light grow more, the blue (normally) slightly more than the red, what is your explaintion, other than plants (more specifically chlorophyll) absorb more red and blue light than green light? Does it involve demons, faries or aliens? Remember, the experiment is designed with a control, and with all other factors equalized, and is repeated lots, thus meaning ANY difference has to be in the factors you are deliberately manipulating.
No comments about links supplied? These 400 witnesses are... rubbish?It's a website. It could be entirely made up. It could be partially made up. They're making money off it to give more details than are there now. What is your native language's word for SUCKER?
It is not proof. It's like me putting up a web page where I say "400 people say that Mr. Bean talks through his hat", quoting two (without any external evidence as to their bona fides), and asking for money to show you anything else, and then using that as 'proof' that you talk through your hat.
Proof of something like aliens could consist of;
1/ High definition photos or video... but that's getting less 'proof' every year as digital manipulation gets more advanced
2/ Live aliens
3/ Dead aliens
4/ Bits of dead aliens
5/ Alien technology
6/ Transmissions originating outside our solar system
7/ Human technology using obvious alien artifacts
8/ Substansiatable documents
9/ George W. Bush eating a live rat on TV, and then pulling a latex face mask off
... and similar things.
You have NONE of that, which is why I think you are credulous. Doesn't make you a bad person, just a credulous one.
You are entitled to your own opinion, not your own facts. Your opinion is there are aliens here now. Big deal. The facts do not support your opinion.
When you have something approaching evidence, come back and play some more.
People living in glass paradigms shouldn't throw stones...