by mind blown 134 Replies latest watchtower scandals
soft+gentle - skepticism and caution ARE silly when completely unfounded and speculative, and furthermore when they are a common and predictable reaction by a particular poster who seems to oppose or otherwise attempt to undermine any firm actions or campaigns that are undertaken against the Society.
Just saying it how it is.
Cedars
nugget I know court cases and lawyers fees are expensive. But this case has not made it that far yet and appears unlikely to.
How do you mean, soft+gentle?
And yes, skepticism is always acceptable.
cedars I'm not playing any games with you and your one dimensional personality
if he can get another bank account opened then PayMate might be a viable alternative to PayPal
my advice to him is to focus his energy on his primary objectives and move straight on past the diversions like they weren't there
thank you shamus
Soft+gentle? Steve Unthank HAS made it very far, and is, despite all odds, continuing onwards. Each & every month his case has gone forward. He's very methodical in how he's going about all of this. He brought this case as a private citizen, he's done a good job, and I think he's been able to do a BETTER job then many lawyers could.
Soft+gentle is out in full force to try to discredit Steve Unthank. Hmmmmmmmm................
But this case has not made it that far yet and appears unlikely to.
Why do you think that is S+G?
soft+gentle - I don't want to play any "games". It is my revulsion towards your "games" that led me to flag your silly comment on this thread, which seems to have met with widespread disapproval from the other posters. Saying I have a "one dimensional personality" is a real low bow, and frankly a stab in the dark. I really don't know what your problem is with me, or Steven Unthank for that matter.
Cedars
soft+gentle - I take great issue with your calling cedars a "one diminensional personality"! Now, you're trying to discredit him too. I think you are working with the WTS and trying to discredit Steve Unthank to all of us, so we stop supporting him, either in spirit or with our wallet.
Yesterday, there was a thread up trying to discredit Steve because he posts/writes/talks on Six Screens. First of all, Steve is half the frickin world away from Six Screens. Second, many JWs who leave still beleive in God, especially at first. Perhaps Steve chose Six Screens becuase he considered it still aligned somewhat with the Bible.
I am seeing a pattern of SOMEONE, SOMEWHERE trying to STOP Steven Unthank. Bank accounts, discrediting on this site . . . .
Steve, watch your back and your brake lines . . . . be careful.
Skeeter
