wha,,, I went back and read,,, it's 18 pages! I was responding to others (I was caught up), and (sorry, man) didn't read your comments earlier,,, so no harm, no foul.
xo
tal
by SweetBabyCheezits 503 Replies latest watchtower child-abuse
wha,,, I went back and read,,, it's 18 pages! I was responding to others (I was caught up), and (sorry, man) didn't read your comments earlier,,, so no harm, no foul.
xo
tal
Hang on there's more...
Yes.
And....
Hamsters.
I knew it!
what's the thrust of your argument? Are you saying that Unthank has a fundamentally flawed character just because he couldn't stump up $350 dollars on one particular occasion when called upon to do so?
Not a flawed character so much as a lousy planner of legal strategies. Shouldn't you at least know the procedures and costs of trying to introduce something to the court system?
We all love an underdog...but geez... at least David got his slingshot and stones ready when he went up against Goliath...
As for you sizemik - in the past whenever I tried to raise a question regarding Mr unthank to add some rational perspective you would pounce. I really don't give a toss for your contempt.
Depends on your definition of rational perspective I suppose. I just get the shits when I go to the trouble of digging up facts, even posting links like I'm the only one in possession of a search engine . . . only to have it ignored repeatedly. That just doesn't fit my definition of rational perspective.
But nice pounce . . . I'm glad I've hit a nerve.
"You know what you get when two shit-tectonic plates collide? Shitquakes, Julian. Shitquakes."
The thread has officially reached the level that I expected it to. Now the accusations are getting a little wild.
You have nothing constructive to say, so I assume you are, as usual, either stirring the pot, or getting off other peoples' pain?
Why don't you just STFU? and go play on the "drunk" thread ?
t