Hypocritical statement in the July 15th Watchtower denouncing those who "forsake" family members on religious grounds

by cedars 41 Replies latest watchtower beliefs

  • cedars
    cedars

    Hi everyone

    I've had a quick glance through the July 15th Watchtower, and at first reading there seems nothing too dramatic to report.

    The title of the first article "Let Jehovah Guide You To True Freedom" seemed ironic to say the least. Not surprisingly, the way you get more freedom is by relinquishing it entirely to the Watch Tower Society. There is also a bizarre statement in the very first paragraph of the article on page 7 (bold highlighted remarks are mine):

    "We are living in a time of increasing greed, lawlessness and violence [yes, unlike in my grandparents' day, when it was decreasing?!]. In response, governments make more laws [that's their job, glad they do it], strengthen police forces [more police on the streets can only be a good thing, especially as the population expands], and install electronic surveillance [ooh, the scoundrels!]. In some countries, private citizens try to increase their safety by installing alarm systems in their homes, as well as extra locks and even electric fences [NO, are you serious? People actually feel the need to take reasonable precautions to safeguard their property? Fools! What an awful affront to their own rights and liberties!]. Many refuse to go out at night, or to let their children play outside unattended-day or night. [What parents would let their children play outside ANYWHERE at night. Don't responsible parents put their children to bed when it's nighttime?] Clearly freedom is on the wane, and the trend will likely continue. [Clearly your grip on reality is on the wane, and this trend is spiralling out of control]."

    I apologise for the lengthy retorts in that quote, however (to me) the opening paragraph of that article sets the tone for the whole discussion, and proves to me beyond a doubt that the Governing Body (or their Writing Department) are growing increasingly detached from reality.

    Anyway, what REALLY grabbed my attention was the following paragraph, which appeared in the article "Of Whom Shall I Be In Dread?" The article highlights positive attributes of King David before saying...

    Family rejection

    I can only assume that this paragraph is referring to those whose parents etc have abandoned them on religious grounds because they have chosen to join Jehovah's Witnesses. I do know of at least one person who has endured something similar on becoming a Witness. Arguably, both the Society and the intolerant and unloving family members are equally culpable in such an instance.

    However, what's really striking about the above statement is how blatantly the Writing Department completely ignores the untold numbers of broken homes and families that have been decimated by their unscriptural application of the shunning doctrine. They paint themselves as a welcoming sanctuary for those whose families take drastic action, and reject any notion that in most cases their doctrines CAUSE family break-ups rather than being a solution for them. They freely accuse families of "forsaking" their loved ones, without acknowledging that they ENCOURAGE family members to forsake one another when it suits their agenda.

    I won't go on about it, because it's an emotional topic for many of us. However, I thought I would flag it as just one more very recent example of Watchtower hypocrisy.

    Cedars

  • minimus
    minimus

    warmth, my ass.

  • undercover
    undercover

    When one decides to leave the JWs, many today have had to endure extreme rejection by their family. Yet, many thus forsaken have found help and understanding in the warmth of ex-JW message boards on the Internet.

  • james_woods
    james_woods

    Those people in Jonestown were in a CULT!!! - but of course, we JWs are not a cult.

  • cantleave
    cantleave

    So they make this statement

    Clearly freedom is on the wane, and the trend will likely continue.

    and then they complain about "freedom" ......

  • minimus
    minimus

    I wouldn't quite call this place an area of "warmth".

  • Phizzy
    Phizzy

    I think the cynical guys in the writing department just piss themselves laughing when they write something like this, in fact I think they have a competition going:

    "Look, look,look what I've just written, can you top that one ?"

    "Oh s**t that is brilliant ! what a bu**er I'm going to have to buy you drinks now and wait till next month to top that load of ironic garbage !"

    "Do you think the R&F will realise we really are taking the piss ?"

    "Nah, you could tell em to fix an explosive device to their ass and blow it to kingdom come and they would think the G.B are blessing them with the privilege !"

    It has long been a tactic of guilty people to project their wrongdoing on to the victims of their crime, the Nazis did it, Rutherford did it, "Religion is a snare and a racket !", well, he should know, he had just started one of the biggest religious rackets of the 20th century.

    Hyocrites is probably too mild an epithet to chuck their way.

  • palmtree67
    palmtree67

    .....many today have had to endure extreme rejection by their family...

    I can only assume that this paragraph is referring to those whose parents etc have abandoned them on religious grounds because they have chosen to join Jehovah's Witnesses.

    Many have endured this extreme rejection???

    I would venture to guess there are many more JW's rejecting family on religious grounds, than worldly families rejecting their own who become JW's.

  • wha happened?
    wha happened?

    In rare cases I've seen non JW's reject any communication with their family after they became a JW. Most of the time, family strays away is because the JW won't stop talking about his new found religion. Now dubs who reject any communication with their family after a marking, or disfellowshipping, that is common if not required.

  • wha happened?
    wha happened?

    so is the act of extreme rejection the issue, or is it only because it occassionaly happenes to dubs that is the issue

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit