Straight after this the conductor said "So is this paragraph justifying Steve's action?' to which the answer came from an older brother in the audience: "The study was not practising true Christianity. She had to study more. When she changed, the husband noticed."
Hello Winston, the conductor seems to be having a mini crisis of conscience himself. Enough to attempt to "clearify" the paragraph as to minimize it's abhorent content. The fact is that the paragraph IS justiftying Steve's actions. It specifically uses an ends justify the means argument to justify the abuse. It creates a perpetual loop that can only be solved by Selma achieving "true Christianity." Once Selma changes, her husband's actions are supposed to change with her. What if Steve doesn't change? That simply means that Selma is still being unchristian and the next step would be to identify the problem she has again. She'll have to go to the woman in the paragraph again and have the exact same conversation. It's a loop designed to protect men at the cost of the quality of life of women and children. The Watchtower protects men because they worship the idea of a Man as the head of the household. Egotism + Chauvinism = The Watchtower's policy for men.
Here is a video which showcases the Watchtower's end product for their precious men:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KuMQjKiaDTg
-Sab