by darth frosty 553 Replies latest members politics
The above is a quote from a very famous jurist in American history, Judge Learned Hand. He was right on the money with this one, and it is actually quoted in many publications concerning income tax issues.
That's true, and when you see these people do that, following the tax code in such a way to pay lower taxes, always remember that it was legislators that the people voted for who wrote the tax code that enabled it to be that way.
Bottom line - Romney called out half of the American people as LOSERS. Plain and simple. He presumed to believe that 50% of Americans say they are victims and that 50% haven't taken responsibility for their own lives. He made it clear he could care less about HALF of the American public and his ONLY reason for hating HALF of the American people was BECAUSE they use some form of government money.
That's it in a nutshell.
If you can't understand that this is a clear case of revulsion and disgust and perhaps hate for what Romney considers POOR, then you are delusional.
The man is a moron. He's an idiot. He shouldn't be standing up there still talking and 50% of Americans should be out booing him at every single speech he gives till he leaves.
This is a guy who never served in the military. His boys never served. Those in the military most often don't pay any federal taxes - they go to other places to defend their government or country, some come home in a box, thousands come home damaged and disabled - all so that people like Romney can stand up on stage and tell them (in his right to free speech) that they are losers. They don't take personal responsibility for their lives. They think they are victims.
Every single person who is of the 50% is indeed a victim. They are a victim of an ongoing class war and societal rage against the poor or perceived poor - those on any government rolls -. A leader would try to change that attitude and behavior, not denigrate people like this.
I think it's sick.
sammieswife
wait, how million in taxes did he pay?
Hypocrites, how many of you even find a way to buy things on the internet to avoid pennies on sales tax?
I've seen your writings on this very board!
For all the romney supporters saying wait for the debates:
By Sunlen Miller | ABC OTUS News - 9 hrs ago
Enlarge PhotoReuters/Reuters - Republican presidential candidate and former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney speaks at a campaign fund raiser in Washington, DC September 27, 2012. REUTERS/Brian Snyder
In a memo sent to surrogates today, Romney senior adviser Beth Myers sets the expectations for Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney low - very low - compared to the "ample rhetorical gifts" of his opponent. The memo says President Obama has a "significant advantage" heading into the first debate.
"President Obama is a uniquely gifted speaker, and is widely regarded as one of the most talented political communicators in modern history," Myers writes, calling Obama a "universally acclaimed public speaker."
Myers' memo is the latest in pre-debate jockeying by both campaigns to set their candidate's expectations low, while raising expectations for their opponent.
Beyond his "natural gifts" for oratory, Meyers argues that Obama has "substantial debate experience under his belt."
"This will be the eighth one-on-one presidential debate of his political career. For Mitt Romney, it will be his first," she says. Obama, in her words, has had "extensive seasoning under the bright lights of the debate stage."
Myers predicts that President Obama will use these advantages to go negative and attack Romney on the debate stage.
"Since he won't - and can't - talk about his record, he'll talk about Mitt Romney. We fully expect a 90-minute attack ad aimed at tearing down his opponent."
Myers concludes that the election will not be decided by the debates.
The first of three presidential debates is Oct. 3, next Wednesday, at the University of Denver.
The full memo from Beth Myers to surrogates is below:
From: Beth Myers, Senior Adviser To: Interested Parties Date: September 27, 2012 Re: 2012 Presidential Debates
In a matter of days, Governor Romney and President Obama will meet on the presidential debate stage. President Obama is a universally-acclaimed public speaker and has substantial debate experience under his belt. However, the record he's compiled over the last four years - higher unemployment, lower incomes, rising energy costs, and a national debt spiraling out of control - means this will be a close election right up to November 6th.
Between now and then, President Obama and Governor Romney will debate three times. While Governor Romney has the issues and the facts on his side, President Obama enters these contests with a significant advantage on a number of fronts.
Voters already believe - by a 25-point margin - that President Obama is likely to do a better job in these debates. Given President Obama's natural gifts and extensive seasoning under the bright lights of the debate stage, this is unsurprising. President Obama is a uniquely gifted speaker, and is widely regarded as one of the most talented political communicators in modern history. This will be the eighth one-on-one presidential debate of his political career. For Mitt Romney, it will be his first.
Four years ago, Barack Obama faced John McCain on the debate stage. According to Gallup, voters judged him the winner of each debate by double-digit margins, and their polling showed he won one debate by an astounding 33-point margin. In the 2008 primary, he faced Hillary Clinton, another formidable opponent - debating her one-on-one numerous times and coming out ahead. The takeaway? Not only has President Obama gained valuable experience in these debates, he also won them comfortably.
But what must President Obama overcome? His record. Based on the campaign he's run so far, it's clear that President Obama will use his ample rhetorical gifts and debating experience to one end: attacking Mitt Romney. Since he won't - and can't - talk about his record, he'll talk about Mitt Romney. We fully expect a 90-minute attack ad aimed at tearing down his opponent. If President Obama is as negative as we expect, he will have missed an opportunity to let the American people know his vision for the next four years and the policies he'd pursue. That's not an opportunity Mitt Romney will pass up. He will talk about the big choice in this election - the choice between President Obama's government-centric vision and Mitt Romney's vision for an opportunity society with more jobs, higher take-home pay, a better-educated workforce, and millions of Americans lifted out of poverty into the middle class.
This election will not be decided by the debates, however. It will be decided by the American people. Regardless of who comes out on top in these debates, they know we can't afford another four years like the last four years. And they will ultimately choose a better future by electing Mitt Romney to be our next president.
So 1st we hear how romney's camp says dont expect that big of a tax cut, now they saying dont expect much from the debate?!?
Maybe folk should just not expect much from romney PERIOD.
Kurtbethel-Nice site kinda Onion-esq!
jehovahs witness mentality does not leave the "ex" pay your taxes, then you can call the kettle black!
How about blue sapphire trying to keep the people renting upstairs "off the books" to avoid paying "income taxes"
One of these days I'm gonna keep tabs on all you guys calling him a cheat!
I think the taxes issue is a non-issue. But there are plenty of other reasons not to vote for the dork in magic panties, including without limitation the fact that he is not promising to balance the budget and that he has exhibited poor judgment repeatedly during this campaign. Obama sucks, but Romney is even worse.
The only real alternative to these turds is Gary Johnson.
For all the romney supporters saying wait for the debates:
Both sides have been downplaying expectations, that way they set up a low hurdle rather than a high one.
