My whole point, and I acknowledge that I would be wrong in many cases, is that the comment that nearly every atheist makes "I would believe if there was proof" is an understatement and there is very little, save for God appearing to say that He exists, that would convince an atheist.
I countered that by suggesting (with confidence) that were sufficient proof for even the likes of OTWO to come about, it would be "believers" that don't accept the actual proof because God would not be what they expected him to be. So think about that.
I would wish that your "God" would fix amputees and stop the waves of a tsunami from killing hundreds of thousands, not because it would offer proof to the worst doubters, but because it's the right thing to do.
I would expect that, at the very least, every person would have the same opportunity that the stories say were given to people in Palatine- that Jesus would walk the earth literally healing and feeding people and they could make up their own minds.
It is just my view that there is plenty of reason to believe in an intellgent creator. And I believe that there is plenty of reason even outside the Bible.
In another thread, I focused on that word, "intelligent." Even if you are so sure that God exists, is mankind and the whole of creation really a testimony to an intelligence?
I'm really not going to comment more on the Bible in this way, because I'm not trying to use that as any "proof". I believe it and it comments on things that I've thought about, and that is why I've brought it up, but I don't want to be accused of using it as "proof" of anything, especially since atheists don't view it as an authority in any way anyway.
Thanks.