Interesting Findings from the ESA Plank Satellite

by cantleave 82 Replies latest social current

  • jgnat
    jgnat

    I can't stand it any more.

    Plank:

    Plank

    Sliver:

    Sliver

    Planck:

    Planck

    Planck satellite:

    Planck S

    Planck image:

    Planck Image

  • slimboyfat
    slimboyfat

    Scientists and their stories huh? All very well and good, but in 500 years will these ideas be superseded just like Newton was? Half the lies science tells you are not true. I find it hard to get excited by these sorts of stories that have little to do with how we live our life anyway. Is light a wave or a particle? Is time a river or movie that can be reminded? Um, who cares? What difference does it make? It's all socially constructed anyway, obviously.

  • QC
    QC

    Slim,

    Einstein stood on the shoulders of Newton a science colossus. His stuff is still relevant.

    CERN and quantum mechanics gave us this (JWN) global instant communications ability. Modernity will always exist; it understands things progressively. See it as clarity with current best practice.

    jgnat,

    You forgot Planck time. The smallest time measurement.

  • slimboyfat
    slimboyfat

    Scientist mumbo jumbo.

  • jgnat
    jgnat

    sbf, what got in your coffee this morning? I had a fool of a teacher who told us that the Northern Lights were reflections of sunlight off the oceans. Even then I knew he was dead wrong. Asking questions and finding new answers is the essence of discovery.

    "Merian [Sibylla Merian] described the life cycles of 186 insect species, amassing evidence that contradicted the contemporary notion that insects were 'born of mud' by spontaneous generation." - Wikipedia

  • cantleave
    cantleave

    Go to the Perry thread then SBF - maybe the idea of dinosaurs being a few thousand years old appeals to you, or how about just find a cave and ignore the scientific advances that have made all our lives better.

  • slimboyfat
    slimboyfat

    What are the northern lights? Are they gods fighting in the sky? It seems as good an explanation as any! Certainly more poetic than the current scientist theory about ions or whatever it is anyhow.

  • slimboyfat
    slimboyfat

    Cantleave don't need to insult me. I am no Creationist. They are just as bad as scientismists. In fact they are scientists. A plague on all their stale and unimaginative houses.

  • slimboyfat
    slimboyfat

    I read A Breif History of Time once. That was enough to put me off scientistic cosmology for life. By the end of it I couldn't care less if scientists ever came up with a unified theory of everthything or whatever you call it. BORING man!

    On the other hand I quite liked The Blind Watchmaker by Richard Dawkins. It reads more like a good story. He even has drawings of little computer generated stick creatures he made to go with the story. Characters to go with the narrative.

  • jgnat
    jgnat

    I think science has the potential to write us new epics, just as engaging.

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit