I fear that rumours of the imminent bankruptcy of the WTS are vastly exagerated.
Conjecture for the motion:
- at congregation level most expenses are catered for by the minority of members
- apathy, stagnation, even contraction in the Western world = less contributions
- growth in numbers amongst developing world countries means more members but not an equivelent increase in resources
- consolidation of branches and property sell off reflect concern, even panic, by the heirarchy at the financial state of the org
- the society is going to have pay Candice Conti millions and millions which will (a) be a huge blow to finances and (b) open the flood gates.
These all have an element of truth and there is no doubt that the downsizing task will reduce costs but many organisations have reduced bricks and morter assests as technology has allowed them to do more with less.
I know from my time as an accounts servant how much of the costs were handled and that less than 50% of the cong contributed.
The skewing of the membership towards less affluent nations will have an impact.
The reality is however that the org has stacks of cash and material assets. I do accept that they might have a problem in the long term, especially if hit with lots of high cost litigation but the amount of reserves they have along with the regular income simply means that there will be a long wait before it get's critical and I simply don't see it becoming terminal any time soon.
One thing that does increase income I suspect is circuit assemblies. It's only annecdotal but I suspect people who do not donate at the hall are more inclined to donate at a larger event. What if they could arrange more assemblies? Perhaps the AGM is a pep-rally that gets people to donate on an emotional whim? Maybe we shall see more special events, streamed round the world?