'facts'
are noy when "NOTHING" acts
by prologos 92 Replies latest jw friends
'facts'
are noy when "NOTHING" acts
What do you mean by "nothing"?
Vivianne, That was implied in the opening post, that if there is no creator (as believed by some Atheists), it was a non-entity, a void that woeuld be the (ghost- actor)
tit is also the big question that remains what, after reading all the books with 'nothinh' in the title,- is that void, the virtual vaccuumenergy fluctuations, tne time-only or time-less nothingness that is responsible, at the origin of/ for it all.
nothing, the void impersonated.
sorry for the text, was blurry-eyed and pressed to go to an appointed. read between the lines.please.
So nothing is something? Is that what you are saying?
if there is no creator (as believed by some all Atheists)
Fixed that for you.
cofty: thank you, so,
can you come up with a name that takes the religious connotation out of 'anti-THEOS-ist'? aka atheist ?
There must be atheists that are so for strictly scientific (terrific) reasons, caring less about the religious hoopla.
I always find it easy to follow atheists' compelling arguments on doctrinal, relgious atrocities, anti religious®idioulos reasons, but find the anti-creation arguments
LAME.
viviane, when it comes down to it : it appears that whenever the chips are down there seems to be something implied, even ephemerally, virtually.
I am calling the shots on the atheists on that one, because if there is no creator ( there are no gods), then there was 'nothing' that can be credited or blamed for it all. but I agree. it was no-thing.
It was not only no THING, it is also beyond our THINK ING,
I have to sleep over it,- to SINK IN.
Whatever you are on, I'd like some.