You yourself identify the target as a smart species.
How can anyone form an informed opinion on a topic if those who do understand the topic won't speak up?
I'll freely admit I'm far more experienced in the realities of network communications - I make a living understanding how an old-school telephone can connect to a modern digital cellphone half-way around the world. That is the simply the expertise that life has led me to.
However, I also understand that if I shoot my cat everytime it does something wrong, my cat is dead. It learns nothing form being killed and never will, and it has no opportunity to create offspring. But based on the concepts of evolution, provided there is a reward for surviving your exteme punishment, you are teaching biology nothing more than how to outsmart you. Do you have a long-term solution to use biology in your favor, or is it just an immediate reaction without a long-term plan?
Attempting to rid the world of a species that doesn't behave the way you prefer will never work. Survival dictates that those who survive will be the ones you fail to kill. You train them only to be better at the thing you wish they didn't do. To create artificial selection that works, you have to ensure those that survive are rewared for the behavior you prefer.
With every coyote you kill, you've only weeded out one of the thousands that wasn't smart enough and that won't pass on it's less-than-smart-enough genes.
I would think the question is: How do you take control of that situation? How do you make dumber coyotes.. that don't need to pursure livestock, etc.
- Lime