Poztate:
No, speaker at the local hall also asked about what pet.
Other things stood out:
1. An intro from the gospels, other than that, no other scripture read from the gospel. The ritual was again taken from 1 Cor, rather than any of the (disparate) gospel accounts.
(Why? As has been noted, it may be because reading and comparing them, a witness will realize they are slightly different, and that Judas WAS there, according to Matthew, Mark and Luke; and that John has no ritual at all.)
2. LONG, oh my god, it was an hour long, used to be 45 minutes.
3. Emphasis on how FEW the 'anointed' are in comparison to the world's population. Part of the WT's tap dance around the ever increasing number of partakers, an uncomfortable and unexpected turn of events for them. Look for that number to drop, even if it isn't really dropping.
4. SO MUCH emphasis on the earthly paradise. I forgot what I was there for! Is this about Jesus or not? I always forget that this is never about what Jesus meant to his followers, or to me, or to anyone actually present for the 'celebration' er, observance of the Lord's Evening Meal (how's that for a super bland euphemism for the last supper?)
It's all about the legality of Jesus' life in exchange for Adam's, and that WE don't decide where we serve Jehovah.
It is just like witness weddings and funerals; seeing people you haven't seen for a while is great, there is a buzz in the air, but soon all the air goes out of the room when the speaker starts in with the uninspired and off target message.
Funeral talk? Witness for the WT
Wedding talk? Witness for the WT
Memorial? Jesus died, don't drink the wine or eat the bread, witness for the WT.
If you want to really get how hollow it is, do the phone hookup.