Shark Evolution

by metatron 135 Replies latest jw friends

  • Laika
    Laika

    I'm pretty sure your constant references to Viviane in the masculine were intentional but I can't say I really understand the joke.

  • cofty
    cofty

    it would appear that Frankie has some serious issues to deal with!

    Yep

  • snare&racket
    snare&racket

    Frankie I got a distinction in A level physics (not much but someting) and my friend is an astro-physicist at Edinburgh university....... what you said.... wasn't true based on what we know possible now.

    If you have evidence of it being true, just as all other facts/truth/science you are required to provide it.

    Otherwise it is just an idea you are putting forward.....which is fine.....but expect to be questioned and asked for evidence.

    I know it seems like many science favourable people here are anal on wanting proof and evidence on every small thing.... but that is because we know what happened when we decided to just let things go, without the evidence and just accept them or assume it could be true/might be true.... you end up a JW for 25 years.

    Let's all just stick to the most honest stance we can make. What er have evidence for and nothing more. Conjecture is fine, but that is all it is...

    By the way I purposefully never said SCIENCE is the only mechanism of persuasion, I specifically said..... evidence is required. Though I only trust the scientific method, for a means to analyse truth, i appreciate some do not, some do not even know about it. Still the minimum required beyond opinion is evidence. IF the opinion comes from someone unqualified in what they speak.... well you can imagine how much weight most would have in it and just how much evidence would be required.

    There is no disrespect intended....I am sure you would agree......Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence....

  • frankiespeakin
    frankiespeakin

    I agree with everything you say about proof and all but this is a discussion group and I posted the video not because I agree 100% with the god dam thing I just found it interesting. And then a bunch dip shits start with their woo woo slinging in ignorance thinking they could critque it as if they had some degree in physics and that's when I took off the gloves and let them knowitall wannabees have it. To me their phonieness and proper decorumness with the superiority complex that was showing itself cause me to try and knock some type of sense into their heads and see what is really going on with their nay saying.

  • Satanus
    Satanus

    A search for 'sharks more evolved', https://www.google.ca/search?as_q=&as_epq=sharks+more+evolved&as_oq=&as_eq=&as_nlo=&as_nhi=&lr=&cr=&as_qdr=all&as_sitesearch=&as_occt=any&safe=images&tbs=&as_filetype=&as_rights= yields 300,100 hits. I was told emphatically by our evolution authority that 'more evolved' is a wrong concept. How can this be?

    S

  • snare&racket
    snare&racket

    Because google doesn't work like that..... it found all the articles with sharks and evolved and more in them.

    Did you bother to look at or read the results? "Sharks are more evolved than we thought"... i.e. the changes in nature were more influential than expected

    "Scientists have previously theorised that the structure of sharks gills had remained unchanged since the emergence of the creatures 400m years ago, long before the arrival of dinosaurs."

    "“This challenges the longstanding view that modern sharks have preserved an unchanged ancestral condition, and indicates that modern sharks have acquired features stemming from evolutionary innovation."

    Maybe next time tbe arsed to read what you link and post !! This proves you even more wrong about evolution.... you are posting evidence for it now.

  • cofty
    cofty

    Frankie were you posting drunk last night?

  • Viviane
    Viviane

    viv- i'm afraid you know what you think you don't know (you are playing with me right?)

    I don't know what you mean by those terms, I'm just hoping you can clairfy

    There are 11 different know dimensions, and it has been established that objects can be in two places, at the same time, simultaneously, in other dimensions,

    That has not at all been established. It doesn't even begin to describe reality or any theory or hypothesis. It sounds like you are mixing up string theory and wave functions from quantum mechanics.

    Maybe I will read physics, but I avoid waffling about stuff I don't have knowledge of.

    I highly recommend you start with "Why Does E = MC^2" by Brian Cox. He does a great job of breaking it down simply and when I read it, it's all in his sexy, sexy, sexy voice. But that probably won't help you, though.

    And so you who doesn't know anything or very very little about physics took the word of a complete stranger, and decided that his ramblings which you had no idea of what he was talking about was the truth about physics.

    Of course not, silly bear! I cited links to experts like Einstein and Hawking along with the direct quotes from their works.

    I'm saying don't let that little shit Viviane bias you with his utter bull shit the guy talks through his ass about shit he has very little knowledge of he's just on some ego trip trying to inflate himself by being some type imaginary genius in his own world view.

    You are so adorable when you act out like a two year old with a potty mouth.

    Viviane is a man?

    Not unless something very odd happened last night!

    I have always found Viviane's posts to be informative and factual.

    Thank you! I work very hard to make them so.

    And then a bunch dip shits start with their woo woo slinging in ignorance thinking they could critque it as if they had some degree in physics and that's when I took off the gloves and let them knowitall wannabees have it.

    I believe you are describing the video and your responses to actual information. In any event, take it back to your thread, please, and don't derail this one. Sharks are amazing and I was hoping to learn more!

    I am not as up to speed on the life sciences as Snare and Cofty and love their posts. I've started several books on their recommendations.

  • Satanus
    Satanus

    But, they THOUGHT sharks were less evolved. They were wrong. As evolutionists, we were required to believe that sharks were less evolved.

    S

  • Viviane
    Viviane

    As evolutionists, we were required to believe that sharks were less evolved.

    If that's what you think, you fundamentally misunderstand how science works.

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit