WAR & RUMORS OF (NUCLEAR) WAR (page 5)

TR

Valis,

I, too, think that is a lovely picture.

TR

UADNA-WA
Unseen Apostate Directorate of North America- Washington Division

Englishman

All money markets are fragile, always have been, always will be. It's the way the system operates.

Same with wars, spats flare up, they die down. Just look at these ex-JW boards to see how wars can start.

This is all natural, it's natures destroy or survive law.

JW's try to overcome these natural laws by suppression of natural things. Worse, they try to make mileage out of tragedies in the mistaken assumption that something being wrong somehow makes them right.

Maybe Pakistan and India will lob a nuke at each other. I doubt it, I think it's just muscle flexing to divert the masses from interior problems, plus a plot to see who can grab a bit more of Kashmir.

Englishman.

You Know

I've noticed you still haven't addressed the fact that the scriptures tell us the wars and rumors of wars ARE NOT the end.

Who said anything about the end? Even if the system collapses that is not THE END, it will be only the beginning of the end, just like Jesus said. / You Know

simwitness

you Know...

I asked for proof, you haven't given any.

Do you have proof of your allegations or not?

dubla

yk-

You don't honestly think that the world would go on in a business-as-usual fashion if millions of people are instantly obliterated on the Indian Sub-continent do you?

of course not....it would probably cause the markets to crash, among other things, and would put a huge dent in our economys recovery. there would be lasting effects, and it would take some time to regain economic stability. would the financial system be doomed forever? thats simply absurd, as most of us know. the system would recover, as it always does. you are under the impression that we all believe everything would continue in this "business-as-usual" fashion if something big happens.......how many times do some of us have to tell you that we realize it would cause huge implications? the difference is, you believe these implications would lead to the fall of the system, and we believe it would be a temporary disaster....as all the disasters of the past have been. in your constant anticipation for armageddon you continue to watch for the next big occurrance that will trigger everything.....you are, as we all know, extremely predictable and pathetic.

That's absolutely false. There are very powerful forces that are determined to initiate a nuclear war in Asia. / You Know

let me guess.......the queen of england, right? come on larouche, who else is pushing for nuclear war, president bush? and i suppose the living members of the beatles are behind this as well, eh? lol, pathetic......and we are supposedly the ones living in a fictional world. larouchepub.com might as well be a saturday morning cartoon.

You are naive as to what how things operate. You need to get yourself educated as to how the Devil runs your world. Click here for starters.> http://www.larouchepub.com/other/2001/2838bin-london.html

ah yes, even more links to the biggest crackpot site on the entire web. why bother? no one here beleives those morons led by larouche hold even a shred of credibility. you might as well be posting links to some nicely priced swampland for us to consider.

i have a question for you yk, and i really dont expect an answer (as you never answer any question that makes you look bad). what about japan dumping all their u.s. equities before tomorrow? is that still on the horizon, or are we to believe that has simply been delayed now? because, according to your other thread, we were supposed to have a "meltdown" by may 31st. are you focused on the pakistan/india problem now simply because yet ANOTHER one of your absurd implications is now going to come and go without even so much as an economic burp? it must get tough having to constantly change lanes and switch gears with each new impending "calamity" fed to you by the moronic larouchians. perhaps you should find a website with a better track record to parrot.

aa

You Know

I asked for proof, you haven't given any.

Yes, I gave proof that there are powerful forces that are working to provoke a war. You simply have refused to consider the evidence. It's called denial and that's basically what this thread is all about. / You Know

simwitness

What proof have you given that "powerful forces are working to provoke a war?"

Since I "missed it" before, maybe you can restate your proof?

What "powerful forces" are you reffering to?

Obviously, since we are not in any "major" wars at this time, mankinds desire for peace is more powerful.

Yes, there will be hotspots and difficulties.

Yes, it is even possible that Pakistan and India may go at it.

If they do, will it cause problems elsewhere? Certainly.

Will we move forward? Absolutely.

dubla

What "powerful forces" are you reffering to?

hes talking about all the conspiracies that have been spoon fed to him by larouchepub.com. he is no doubt referring to the british and u.s. govts., as well as strategic special agents like the beatles. they are all in it together, and they all planned the 9/11 attacks as well.

aa

You Know

What proof have you given that "powerful forces are working to provoke a war?"

Did you click on the link I provided? / You Know

You Know

Small-minded individuals are terrified at the thought that the world that they have accepted as portrayed on televison and through the mainstream media may not be the way things really are. So, they attack anyone who poses as a threat to their preferred fantasies. The fact is that London is the inheritor of the Roman Empire and as such has served as the primary place of Satan's throne for centuries and from where he has sought to control human affairs. Amazingly, even the mainstream media occasionaly stumble upon some aspect of the truth about how the world really works. / You Know

Click here > http://abcnews.go.com/sections/world/DailyNews/WTC_london011022.html

WAR & RUMORS OF (NUCLEAR) WAR

Share this