>>Ozzie does not have to prove anything to you.<<
He also doesn't need you to do his replying either. Or does he?
>>He was correct in exposing the Watchtower and its witnesses.<<
According to who? You? Exposing ISN'T saying MEN ARE GUILTY. Exposing isn't saying THEY ARE NOT INNOCENT. Exposing isn't saying THEY SHARE IN THE SINS OF OTHERS. THAT'S PURE CONDEMNATORY JUDGMENT of other men.
THAT IS WRONG according to Christ and Paul, NOT ME.
>>And I proved it scripturally as well.<<
I have seen no scriptual proof in validating another sinner judging another sinner with GUILT and CONDEMNATION. The Bible is quite plain. How you judge another YOU SHALL BE JUDGED. Quite elementary even.
Do you judge CONDEMNATORY and NEGATIVE of another man, SO YOU WILL BE JUDGED THE SAME WAY.
Do you judge COMMENDATORY and POSITIVE of another man, SO YOU WILL BE JUDGED THE SAME WAY.
>>You have Judgment to condemnation confused with Judgment in the context of exposure or enlightenment.<<
I have not confused ANYTHING. When others such as yourself and Oz use stuff like "they are NOT INNOCENT" and "they are guilty of the sins of others" is way over the line of condemnatory judgment that is painted quite clearly by Christ and Paul.
>>Most references to judgment were written to prevent abuse and are therefore negative.<<
If you are not a judge of RIGHTEOUSNESS, then ALL NEGATIVE judgment is abuse. You are not a judge and neither is the great Oz. (Though you are surely playing the part unauthorized.)
>>But judgment is a word that can be used in more than this one context. This does not mean that judgment is forbidden.<<
As I have stated previously, I have full understanding and no problem with RIGHT judgment which would be for THE INDIVIDUAL who is making JUDGMENT FOR HIMSELF or another man in a positive way. Once that one puts HIS JUDGMENT of what is right and wrong on anothers CONSCIENCE, condemning to guilt, HE is WAY OUT OF LINE. If that is how YOU wish to perform, go for it. It is not mine to stop you.
>>There are many examples of judgment in scripture as I demonstrated.<<
You demonsatrated NO NEGATIVE JUDGMENT from one sinner to another as being GOOD. Why? Because it was NEVER recorded in the Bible. PAUL never negatively judged anyone. YOU and OZ negatively judge individual dubs...that's WRONG, not according to me, but by Christ and Paul. But, as I said, I can't stop that which you are going to do, as that is obviously what you are.
>>You are judging here in this thread in fact and but you cannot see it.<<
I am showing YOU what Paul has said. I have neither CONDEMNED nor COMMENDED you by MY own words. I have not called you GUILTY nor have I used the phrase NOT INNOCENT. Those are the words of judgment that you and Oz choose to use freely on others and I have refrained from using them at all. I have showed you PLAINLY Christ's GLOBAL admonition DO NOT JUDGE and yet you STILL want to play the JUDGE.
Again go for it, as that is the part you obviously must play.
>>You may think you are doing the right thing but you are both judging and abusing texts.<<
That is your opinion. I have neither CONDEMNED, nor have I accused anyones GUILT or INNOCENCE. You have done BOTH by claiming dubs are guilty, which means you must be innocent. Perhaps your sins as a dub will not be forgiven you...afterall, God has NO OBLIGATION to you or any man. So...judge away judge. Make your righteousness known to all men. It is as you must be.
>>The above text does not prevent exposing the wrongdoer.<<
Exposing and JUDGING are TWO VERY DIFFERENT THINGS as I have shown before. Yet you choose to ignore it. Be the judge, it is YOUR WILL.
>>Exposing their sin does not mean we hate them.<<
Exposing and JUDGING are two different things. Always has been, always will be. Hate has nothing to do with ANYTHING we are discussing. It's actually all about LOVE.
>>Such exposure even if it does not aid the wrongdoer can aid others involved with such persons. This shows love not hate for ones fellowman. In fact this is what we are obligated to do.<<
Exposing and JUDGING are two different things. Always has been, always will be.
>>Exposure is judgment and it does not matter if you believe it or not.<<
Now the judge decides to redefine words to fit his WILL TO WANT TO JUDGE OTHER MEN. Go for it.
Please go to the dictionary and read the definitions of expose and judge. They are NOT synonamous.
>>John 5:30 I can of mine own self do nothing: as I hear, I judge: and my judgment is just; because I seek not mine own will, but the will of the Father which hath sent me.
Jesus did not forbid judging and admitted that He judged others. (Mostly by telling them off) There are many such examples as everyone well knows.<<
I can't believe you use the TRUE JUDGES work, a SINLESS MAN who was AUTHORIZED to judge, as suppport for you, an old man STEEPED in his sins from birth, as JUST reason to judge other sinful men. That is bogus. You have just proved yourself fighting Christ himself. You have NO RIGHT to compare your CONDEMNATORY judgments of other men, to Christ's RIGHTEOUS CONDEMNATORY judgments of men.
>>John 7:24 Judge not according to the appearance, but judge righteous judgment.<<
Old man, this is JESUS the true judge speaking to THE DEFIANT JEWS. He has EVERY RIGHT to slap them in the face, as it is HIS GOD GIVEN AUTHORITY to JUDGE THEM. You cannot use this text to support YOUR sinful wish to be a judge because you are a SINFUL MAN and CANNOT judge correctly in righteousness. (No matter how great and right you think your judgments are.)
>>And these are instructions for everyone else evildoer or not.<<
These are not instructions kind sir. These are words of CONDEMNATION to the defiant Jews. You have twisted the truth of these simple texts to support a twisted view.
>>This is what Ozzie did, this is what I did and this is the message you deny or refuse to accept.<<
I expose you BOTH as being in violation of Christ's and Paul's simple words. Yes, I deny you and Oz having the right to put guilt and the sins of others on them. Yes I refuse to accept YOUR and Oz's judgments of other men as being NOT INNOCENT as doves.
>>Judgment is permitted, but it must be righteous judgment of course.<<
So how does a wicked unrighteous man pull off any righteous judgments? HE CAN'T. IT IS IMPOSSIBLE. That is why the counsel, BACK OFF ON THE JUDGMENTS DUDES. Or you'll be bagged.
>>Based upon proper knowledge and personal experience. But it was necessary for everyone to see that you do not understand such things and warn them about you in the process.<<
Warn them about me? Oooo. Sound the warning. The judge has spoken. Another guilty evildoer in their midsts.
Well, I was born that way...a dirtbag of the first degree. At least I won't condemn any dubs, or you, or Oz.
I am not righteous.
Edited by - pomegranate on 14 September 2002 22:23:22