There's nothing wrong with displaying sexual hospitality.
It is not wicked behavior. It is not immoral.
Unless one believes that only those that choose the way of
the bible are moral.
p.s. this is not an attack on the bible.
by buffy 95 Replies latest social relationships
There's nothing wrong with displaying sexual hospitality.
It is not wicked behavior. It is not immoral.
Unless one believes that only those that choose the way of
the bible are moral.
p.s. this is not an attack on the bible.
I certainly hope the operative word isn't "went", as in past tense.
Edited by - DebraDoll on 16 October 2002 23:24:14
You are so confused Buffy, it's not JWs that classify fornication and adultery as sin, but Jehovah God.Have you forgotten so quickly Jehovah's commandments? Read once again Gal. 5:19-21.
Adultery was a crime of ownership whose penalty was death. Male adulterers would only be sentenced to death if they messed with someone's property ie: another married women.
Fornication was allowed so much that there were even rooms for both male and female prostitutes in the temple of Salomon. These rooms were built since its inception.
Jehovah himself was an adulterer.
Jehovah is only the god of, and for the Israelites. Jehovah's father and god gave him Jacob's descendents as his lot. Read Deut. 32: 8,9 s l o w l y, and this time think about what you read.
Read your bible as you would analyze any book, and don't make excuses for him.
I did not go sex crazy, but stopped feeling guilty about it.
Where'd the troll go????
I wanted to sell him a bridge.
I just want sworeoffjah to come back.