Memory is still being researched - and is definitely not totally understood. I think we can all agree on that. As my psych. professsor brought out - how does one study something invisible, not able to be metered by a machine, and can be affected by time, place, disease, etc.? And how does one know that the study is totally unbiased? It's still be researched, just like many functions of the brain processes.
Memory is relatively fluid - and can be influenced. How many of us have seen old pictures of ourselves as children at a party, etc. - and really not remembered that party - but another participant recounts it for us.....and we remember their account as our own?
How many of us have no memory of an event, until someone reminds us of it - and then, we DO remember, and add our own facts to the event - and others concur. The memory just hadn't been "triggered" yet in our own brain. When this happens to me, my own family just says "that damned brain of yours, mom." (We're so affectionate)
It's interesting that no responses are dealing with Mulan's event - which her peers acknowledged about the man too. I've had the same type thing happen to me, about several different things in my childhood. I was seriously dating a guy in HS for 2 yrs, (16 to 18) finally got engaged to him & remember having sex with him 4 times - all of which I didn't enjoy. A couple of years ago, I spoke with him for the first time in 20 yrs, and he was stunned......his memory of us was that we had sex 4/5 times a week for 2 yrs, all sorts of places. I called a couple of my old girlfriends who concurred - I had talked about it with them. They remember - because I was more *active* than them.
I have no memory of all those times, but I'm taking at least 4 other people's word for it - and I really can't see me dating someone that long and only having sex once after first month.......and then 2 yrs later. Just doesn't make sense - also because I remember worrying about being pregnant, knowing a lot about sex, etc.....lol, I just don't remember the sex. Btw, he said he thought I enjoyed it....that's good to know, I suppose. But I have no memory of him during all those times, I have memories of dating him, but not of the sex others remember. I have no memory of a lot of serious things that others told me about witnessing/hearing from me.
It doesn't mean it didn't happen.....it most likely means I don't remember it currently - and I've tried. I remember a conversation about my teen sex (or lack thereof) when I was 24. By that time, 6 years later - I know I didn't remember.
Just because one doesn't remember - doesn't mean it didn't happen. Just because one remembers - doesn't mean it happened that way - or at all. Memory is a strange thing.
Cognitive psychologists today fully reject the "repressed memory" theory. - JanH
I don't believe that's a provable statement - and is wholly dependent on the exact definition of "repressed memory theory" - as told by which side of the argument. There are good psychologists on both sides of this argument. Many issues are tied to the "theory" .......and some of those issues have nothing to do with memory.
waiting
ps: edited to say that no one had responded to Mulan's post when I posted. Thus showing I'm damned slow today. *sigh* - raining here.
Edited by - waiting on 13 October 2002 14:46:51