Hillary,
I wasn't talking to you!!!!!!!! Nor do I wish to.
Thank you Wendnesday!!
"Silentlambs" was the "Messenger...
by Gilgamesh 46 Replies latest watchtower child-abuse
-
-
LongHauler
Must we try and assasinate Bill Bowens character here on this forum? Certainly he is not a perfect man, and perhaps he is going a tad overboard comparing himself to a messenger. Anyone who stands up for the rights of others still has to have something good inside of him though. Perhaps his overzealousness is just a bi-product of the anger some feel when they have the wool lifted from thier eyes with regards to the Watchtower, Bible and Tract selling society for the first time. Disagree with the way Bill Bowen is handling things, no problem. But lets not forget that he has shed the glaring light of the media on this twisted little secret of the orginization.
-
IslandWoman
Hillary,
I wasn't talking to you!!!!!!!! Nor do I wish to.
You tell him how it is Sloan! lol
Btw, I'm not "talking" to you either I'm posting on an open discussion board.
I know, I know ........
IW
-
SLOAN
IW,
-
IslandWoman
SLOAN
IW
-
hillary_step
Sloan,
When you post to a public discussion board you speak to all its participants. When you wish to speak to an individual, you speak to them privately via email. If you do not have their email address or if it is locked, you politely request it.
I hope that grasping this reality is not beyond you, if it is I suggest that you think before you post - obviously something you have not yet learned to do.
HS
-
ashitaka
Agree with IW to the tenth power.
ash
-
expatbrit
no person is, or should be beyond criticism
Hillary you plagiarist, I was fulminating this stuff two months ago!...lol
Ironically though, it was Mr. Raymond Franz who I was talking about....
Expatbrit, whipping out his sausages to grill over the flames
-
hillary_step
Expat,
Expatbrit, whipping out his sausages to grill over the flames
My God, the things that people do for pleasure....lol
And yes, I agree, Raymomd Franz, and each one of us regardless of the good we are doing or have done in our lives should not be beyond criticism. We are after all just people, that is all.
HS
Edited by - hillary_step on 23 December 2002 15:2:51
-
Cassiline
I don't know if this problem is serious to anyone, but I suspected it might be a problem for at least one person. Also for myself, it's quite OK with me to combine and show both names. But one needed more anonymity because I try to help both JWs and exJWs without letting those goals interfere with each other. Also, I speak of my children and offer many more items of information that would identify me with one name vs. the other.
Some might be offered the choice privately if they want to discontinue one of their id's rather than have them both displayed.
Gilgamesh
You state you have two names and give your reasons for wanting to keep your anonymity. IMO you seem to think that your reasoning for doing so should be accepted, while IF messenger and silentlambs are one in the same his/their reasons for doing so seem not to be acceptable.
Then you state that you have read 3000 plus posts in a 24-hour period to confirm so before the posts were lost due to forum changes. After which Simon states that this loss of posts if indeed it does happen will be temporary.
You go on to suggest you believe that those who do have two accounts (including yourself IMO) should be offered the choice of having them displayed in private.
Did you offer this choice to silentlambs and messenger if they are one in the same? Seems as if double standards are being presented. Pot/kettle/black perhaps?
I ask for the obvious double standard IMO, and your claims of newbie status when first posting about this subject in the thread below.
http://www.jehovahs-witness.com/forum/thread.aspx?id=39735&site=3
Edited by - cassiline on 23 December 2002 15:10:27