I think it was Scott Adams who said that Trump would redefine the definition of "impeachment" more than be impeached, and that is already happening.
I doubt the founding fathers thought of the clause where the house votes to proceed but then ... doesn't. So there is now debate as to whether he's really been impeached or not.
If there is an indictment without a trial, is someone really prosecuted or standing trial for something? What does an indictment mean if it doesn't lead to anything.
More seriously, why is someone mucking around and playing games with the process?
People should ask themselves what the point if it is. What are they trying to achieve?