by atomant 136 Replies latest watchtower beliefs
Twitch: "--would such coincidences be monumental?
not talking about the 1000 light second Earth orbit diameter, coincident, which is an artifact of all the manmade factors that go into that round , ten-finger figure. but let us assume, that in the speed of light, time vs length analysis', other resonances,-- linked to orbital or Star, or galaxy eigenschwingungen could be established? resonances on a cosmic scale?, that would be amazingly monumental imho.
What would be really monumental is if there was a piece of toast that looked JUST LIKE JESUS!!!1!
A Ha; "What would be really monumental is if there was a piece of toast that looked JUST LIKE JESUS!!!1!
with billions of multiverses cooking, it is surely going to happen. cook & look, You could be the toast of the town. PS, any comment like that from the past, and signed AH, would prove the diagnosis, and be worth a fortune now.
That there are mathematical relationships in nature isn't monumental; it's just physics.
That you attempt to infer meaning behind "hidden patterns" (that only you see) is more the question. What would be amazing is if what you say was actually true, in which case actual scientists would correlate your theories. If that happens let us know.
Otherwise you're just a crazy old man spouting off pseudoscience about music of the spheres and deism (neither of which has any basis in science). Be the poet you wannabe; leave science to the scientists.
Twitch I gave you a "like" on that, , being crazy really helps you when you age well and slowly. Music of the spheres? I heard that the highest notes are in vibrating strings, but I thought more 2 dimensional, of chladni plates, Cymbals of various sizes. . --The beauty of music, would that make the deist god a composer of heavenly music?.-- remember the line; "is god a mathematician?, --- I hope not? Ps: That thought you triggered is very appealing: The deist creator as an instrument maker, composer, the pre-primordial Stradivarius, Hayden? I had limited him to be a worker.
Twitch: "That there are mathematical relationships in nature isn't monumental; it's just physics.
and physics is embodied in the universe, in my view a real cathedral.
So... Prologos admits his numbers are just crazy numerology. Awesome.
In Carroll's book, " from eternlty to here", the observation is made, that sequences recurring in unrelated fields can reveal deeper underlying common truth. case in point: William Herschel, the composer and discoverer of "Uranus" aka George's Star, could have said to himself : Hm-- Hym-- Those octave organ pipes are always the double length of the previous one. Funny, -- Uranus, my baby, pride and joy, is double the distance from Saturn,compared to Jupiter, and that spacing is double from Jupiter, and that double from Ceres, and that double from Mars, and that double from Earth, and that double from Venus, -- The Solar system's orbits measurements surely look like organ pipes, oboe's wind length, harpsicord strings, ---but It took Gregory, Titius & Bode to publish that, and wave and resonance theories are surely part of physics, cosmology's future. and it is all in the laws/energy package that came through the beginning, a point in time. It is divine, if you enjoy music. great vibes. music of the planetary field, in addition to the orbital timing resonances, the quiet areas aka lagrangian points-----PS:
so: bringing c into that picture shows what cosmic time ings correspond to the length. surely a valid conjecture, and: allow me to remind you to remain on topic: Using the analogy of the planetary field as a dance floor: The sun, and the moon/earth pair, rotate in unison ~ 28.5 days per revolution. 99.9%of the mass, including the all important biomass.
Uranus, my baby, pride and joy, is double the distance from Saturn,compared to Jupiter, and that spacing is double from Jupiter, and that double from Ceres, and that double from Mars, and that double from Earth, and that double from Venus,
Interesting.... except virtually all of it is false. Uranus is roughly twice the distance from the sun as Saturn, but the rest of this is untrue. You've had so many of your miraculous resonances exposed as false, and rather than address the inaccuracies, you just bulldog your way onto another set of (false) coincidences. This kind of mumbo-jumbo might have worked decades ago, before the internet. Now all you do is lose more credibility with every false statement.
A ha, here is my comment: sorry, but here, from my unaided memory,-- are the numbers to within ~3% . In 1/10 of AUs.
Venus 7 to Earth; 10 [fingers] = 3. ---- Earth 10 to Mars 16, = 6; the double of 3.-- Mars 16 to Ceres 28 =12 the double of 6.--Asteroids 28 to Jupiter 52 = 24, the double of 12.-- Jupiter 52 to Saturn 100, = 48, the double of 24, --- Saturn 100 to Uranus 196 = 96 , the double of 48.-- Uranus 196 to Pluto 388 = 192 , the double of 96,-- and -----
There are 7 octaves or doublings of orbit radius, or diameter*** differences. in the solar system as far as we know so far, not out. Using Kepler's laws you can convert these distances to times., or orbital velocities, all in similar ratios. The 2 important ones, Earth, because life is here, and Jupiter, for it has most of planetary mass, the gravitational influence, are within .5% of these idealized values. so:?
Ps I am not saying that the deist god inspired Steinway & Cie, but similar results could indicate similar methods. *** I chose orbit diameters because of the 1000 seconds ligh-speed figure for the earth orbit. time conversion.You are right, octaves would change the whole orbit, not the orbit size difference, thank you for the correction!!
Funny, -- Uranus, my baby, pride and joy, is double the distance from Saturn,compared to Jupiter, and that spacing is double from Jupiter, and that double from Ceres, and that double from Mars, and that double from Earth, and that double from Venus,
Without knowing the values of those distances I have to object to that assertion. The only way you can maintain those ratios to be true all the time you would need concentric circular orbits and identical duration of their rotation around the sun. But none of this is true. Please explain.
I do believe there is something wonderful about life and the universe, but the way you view things is more analogous to numerology than it is to reality or science.
