Scholar wrote: "The dream centred around Neb's experience to make the point as part of a prophetic drama so he was banished from his throne for seven literal years, a fact that you do not accept anyway."
As usual, your argument makes no sense. I don't accept that Neb's experience is a prophetic drama for a secondary interpretation on the dream regarding 1914 since the Bible never suggests such nonsense, but I do indeed accept that the King was vanished for 7 literal years. Mine is the strictly exegetical analysis of the chapter.
Scholar wrote: "Regarding your last question it is for you to make an account of this as it is you that insists that it has only a literal application so put up or shut up!!!"
It seems to me you were attempting to prove that the "seven times" couldn't have possibly been literal since we can't account for the King's time off using historical records, but then realized this was a harmful argument to your cause, since your leaders at Watchtower also say that the King went missing for 7 literal years.
Scholar wrote: "The interpretation of those seven times is done in harmony with sound exegesis drawing upon not only the book of Daniel but the OT and the NT."
You obviously have no idea what "exegesis" means, and I'm not gonna bother trying to explain it to you again. I've already shown many times over how your secondary interpretation of the dream is completely made up. I've already shown time and time again how there is absolutely no reason to claim that Daniel 4 is connected to Luke 21. I've already shown time and time again how there is no reason to connect the dream of Dan 4 with Jeremiah's 70 years. I've already shown time and time again how there is one interpretation to the dream in Dan 4, and Daniel himself gives it to us, without any suggestion to a second "greater" meaning as you and your leaders suggest.
Again, anyone is able to realize this fact by opening their bibles and seeing so for themselves.