dear Hanged Man...
So, basicly you're appropriating the name Jesus and just attaching it to your principal. Why? Do you think it might validate your principal in some way or perhaps invalidate the biblical precepts? Why attach the name Jesus (specifically) to your principal? Is there some reason why your principal couldn't stand on its own merits?
According to the bible, moses and Jesus had addressed the problem of transgression/sin as their MAIN theme. Why would the bible give so much ink to this problem and its resolution if, as you say, the bible is really talking about birth and death cycles?
Assuming moses and Jesus and all the bible writers were learned enough to write a book like the bible, don't you think they would have come right out and said the things you suggest they were saying?
What would be the point? Anyone can see that things are born and things die. The earth and all that is in it are part of a cycle. The thing is, there is no point in stating the obvious. The bible is a revelation of things that aren't obvious. It actually even says that in a few places...
I mean really, you believe the bible writers concealed the obvious in a mystery for future generations (which was also stated as a command-teach your children this stuff). That doesn't seem at all odd to you? Or condesending to human intellect?