by Simon 240 Replies latest social current
If the pressure on Floyd's neck area suppressed his breathing which just provoked the cardiac arrest with that amount of fentanyl in his system, it just looks really bad when a cop lays his knee across someone's neck when they its noted that the individual is assumed to be clinically dead.
Not a smart move either way , especially when its all being filmed live.
Was this a case of intentional murder , I dont think so.
With the toxicology report in hand and her testimony, why wasn't that used to establish cause of the death ?
It was. They asked the medical examiner - If you had seen Floyd's body, without the tape, what you you think. Answer: drug overdose or heart attack.
You would think the defense lawyers would use this during the trial.
Uhhh he did. BTW, it was one lawyer against about 10 ... but whatever. I happen to think that the lawyer for Chauvin did a good job, given all that he was up against. And the judge did alright too - except he should have moved the trial to a location that wasn't so threatening.
If the toxicology report showed an enormous amount of fentanyl in his system which would caused a cardiac arrest as its known to, why didn't the involved doctors state so ?
They did. But the prosecution had their key witness. I doctor who didn't get paid, as if that means he is any more credible. Seems he had an agenda. He took the stand and declared that there was no other cause, not even a little bit, that caused this death. Not the drugs, not the heart condition, nothing.
And the jury, being faced with possible doxing and death threats, suddenly agreed with the prosecution.
... it just looks really bad when a cop lays his knee across someone's neck when they its noted that the individual is assumed to be clinically dead.
Sure. It looked bad. That's why, when this first occurred, you had near universal agreement that Chauvin was at fault. But, like always, you wait a bit. The evidence comes out, and the full story is not nearly as clear.
But that was the point of Crowder's demonstrations (2 total). If this position really cuts off the air, or is a "blood choke", then let's give it a shot. He tried it twice, with more weight. It *looks* bad. And, it is painful, but not deadly.
Granted, the jury was never exposed to any demonstration like this, and I think it would have been a great demonstration to have, right there in the court. Let's just see what happens when you take a man, whos not about to explode in 5 minutes, and place him under that hold.
Why would any of us believe anything from the Leftist/Legacy Media who were caught red-handed by Project Veritas, and who today, lied and practiced their usual spin about the tragic story of the 16 year old girl who was shot trying to murder another girl??
How many of YOU ( you know who you are ) watched the un-cut camera footage of the above and heard the un-cut 911 call and know what actually happened as opposed to the CNN and MSNBC ( whatever joke Lester Dolt works for ) reports that have formed your strongly held opinion?
What was that??? None of you did??
DD
The same “woke” idiots who are offended/rioting and looting and believe George Floyd’s death was the worst thing they’ve ever seen are the same “woke” idiots who don’t realize their I-phones require the deaths of prisoners/slave labor in China, a nation that will gladly put a bullet in the back of their skulls and toss them in a mass grave when they have outlived their usefulness as “Social Justice Warriors.”
How many of you were offended by Ashley Babbit’s death? Were you offended by the “Summer of love?” How about child trafficking at the border?? I wonder....
DD
Interesting comments and perspective from Gad Saad …
While the jury didn't fall for it, the defense did what they are supposed to do and raised possible doubts that people like Simon pinpointed in their minds and ignored all the real evidence.
I do not agree that a cop could be guilty of three very different counts he was charged with, but that was probably a message that ANYONE actually there at the time could tell that this was horribly wrong.
While the jury didn't fall for it, the defense did what they are supposed to do and raised possible doubts that people like Simon pinpointed in their minds and ignored all the real evidence.
The way this paragraph is constructed, I'm honestly not sure if he's saying Simon is ignoring all the real evidence or the jury is ignoring the real evidence.
I think Simon was right on the onset in implying this case was going to highly influenced from outside political and social pressure.
The decision and verdict by the jury of intentional murder for the first two charges proves that.
If this was really a fair trial without the enormous outside influence, the last charge of criminal negligence manslaughter would most likely be the only charge levied.
While the jury didn't fall for it, the defense did what they are supposed to do and raised possible doubts that people like Simon pinpointed in their minds and ignored all the real evidence.
The way this paragraph is constructed, I'm honestly not sure if he's saying Simon is ignoring all the real evidence or the jury is ignoring the real evidence.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Sure, whichever works for you.
