WHY ALAN FRAUDBACKER IS DOOMED!

by You Know 90 Replies latest jw friends

  • riz
    riz

    No doubt, wasa.

    Hey Yadirf,

    He had his trial and was found innocent. Do the words "Drop It" mean anything?

    For Christs' sakes, leave him be and let him get on with his life. I'm certain that if you were ever in his position that you would wish to be afforded the same courtesy.

    riz

  • Yadirf
    Yadirf

    wasasister said:

    Why is it when someone like this starts out with a really good idea, they invariably muck it up by saying "but..."????

    Is it your time of the month, wasasister? Have you run out of Midol tablets? Why take your feminine problems out on the male gender?

    riz said:

    He had his trial and was found innocent. Do the words "Drop It" mean anything? For Christs' sakes, leave him be and let him get on with his life.

    Yadirf had said to Tallyman:

    But if it's not too difficult for you to talk about, may I ask you a question?

    Who appointed YOU, riz, to be Tallyman's spokesperson? I didn't press him for an answer, and I believe he's fully capable of making his own reply. Besides, the impression I get (based upon his pressing /You Know about whether or not Moses was a murderer) is that Tallyman may be open to talking about things. And so, I'm still awaiting his reply ... not only regarding the question I asked but about what I stated about Moses (which seemed to be of some interest to him). Does Tallyman REALLY need you and wasasister to intervene for him?

    Yadirf

  • TR
    TR

    You Know,

    Unfortunately, you can only be viewed in this manner:

    "Kults Suck"

  • riz
    riz

    Yadirf,

    I stated:

    I'm certain that if you were ever in his position that you would wish to be afforded the same courtesy.

    Nobody appointed me to be Tally's spokesperson. Common sense dictates that there is a huge difference between Tally's talking about the biblical story of Moses and Tally wanting to divulge his real life experience. The latter being something he or anyone else for that matter, would most likely not want to rehash on a public forum.

    Why is that so hard to understand? And just because wasa called you on it too, you asked her if it's her time of the month. Hey, as long as you're on a roll asking inappropriate questions,... [8>]

    riz

  • wasasister
    wasasister

    Just because I find you irritating and silly means I have hormonal problems? I don't need PMS to dislike stupidity, or sentences which start out, "I should probably keep my mouth shut, but..."

    Tallyman doesn't need Riz or I to speak for him. He seems to have a well qualified legal advisor to do that. However, Riz and I have every right to challenge you when you are wrong, and I trust we will both continue to do so, no matter what the time of month.

    By the way, assuming you are male, what's YOUR excuse?

  • Yadirf
    Yadirf
    Riz and I have every right to challenge you when you are wrong--wasasister

    Ahh, Judge Wasasister ... she has determined that Yadirf is "wrong". Not only that, she finds Yadirf "irritating" and "silly" and "stupid". Anything else, Judge Wasasister? Oh yes, YOU'VE determined that Tallyman shouldn't talk about his past affairs. I guess that since Judge Wasasister has rendered her decision that Tallyman may as well forget about responding to Yadirf, lest he be in defiance of the Judge's decision. Too, I notice you're into twisting my words according to your liking. So you think that if the two of you blather on long enough that you will have 'stood-in' for Tallyman ... is that all you are is a couple of pawns?

    ...Tally wanting to divulge his real life experience. The latter being something he or anyone else for that matter, would most likely not want to rehash on a public forum.--riz

    And I allowed for that possibility, even as my words to Tallyman show ... and you know they do. So what's your beef? ... except to be a rude smart-butt pawn.

    Yadirf

  • AlanF
    AlanF

    To Yadirf/Friday:

    It's pretty clear that you have no reading comprehension for the Scriptures at all. There is no comparison between what Moses did and Tallyman's situation. Here is the Bible account:

    Exodus 2:11-12
    11 Now it came about in those days, as Moses was becoming strong, that he went out to his brothers that he might look at the burdens they were bearing; and he caught sight of a certain Egyptian striking a certain Hebrew of his brothers. 12 So he turned this way and that and saw there was nobody in sight. Then he struck the Egyptian down and hid him in the sand.

    Note clearly: Moses "turned this way and that" in order to make sure that no Egyptian observed him carrying out his plan to kill the Egyptian. Moses planned to kill the Egyptian (whether killing him was ethical or not is irrelevant to this point). Therefore, Moses certainly had a choice as to whether to kill the Egyptian or not, because he was calm enough to turn and look "this way and that".

    On the other hand, Tallyman's circumstances were quite different, as I'm sure he will tell you. There was no planning involved, no time to decide anything except "save myself from severe injury" because of the viciousness of the attack upon his person.

    Another major difference is that Moses was not acting in self-defense, whereas Tallyman was.

    It is a measure of your ethical deadness that you refuse to understand these things. You refuse simply because in your narrow little disfellowshipped JW mind, giving any credit at all to an outspoken JW critic is A Very Bad Thing. In short, you apply double standards. Far from being a rude, smart-butt pawn, you're a lying, dumb-ass hypocrite.

    AlanF

  • wasasister
    wasasister

    Now, now Alan.

    Far from being a rude, smart-butt pawn, you're a lying, dumb-ass hypocrite.

    You'd better go take your Midol. Obviously, if you disagree with Yardif, there is something wrong with your body chemistry. Not since I discontinued working in car groups with pre-menopausal sisters have I had anyone express such an interest in my monthly cycle. I find it quite flattering.

    If Yardif would care to re-read my original post, he would understand I was not taking issue with what he asked Tally. I do wonder, however, if Yardif was in similar circumstance if he would have time to think of different "do-over" situations and choose from a list while his life was being threatened. But I digress.

    What I found silly, and still do, is anyone starting a sentence with, "I probably shouldn't say this, but..." and then going on to say it.

    I don't know Yardif well enough to dislike him, but I find his posts to be silly.

    This will be my last reply on this thread. It just keeps bringing YK's drivel to the top.

    Judge Wasasister, presiding.

  • Yadirf
    Yadirf
    my monthly cycle. I find it quite flattering.--Judge Wasasister

    Quit being so silly, you know that what really flatters you is TR having posted that picture of you up above. I recognize that as being YOUR left hand.

    If Yardif would care to re-read my original post, he would understand I was not taking issue with--Judge Wasasister

    No you took issue with my having said "I probably shouldn't say this, but..." -- WHICH IS NOT WHAT I HAD SAID AT ALL. That's the reason I said that you are into twisting my words according to your liking.

    I do wonder, however, if Yardif was in similar circumstance if he would have time to think of different "do-over" situations and choose from a list while his life was being threatened. But I digress.--Judge Wasasister

    That's quite smooth of you, Judge Wasasister ... trying to divert the attention off of my question to Tallyman by asking ME what I would do if faced with a similar situation. You need to stop your lying by insinuating that I implied that Tallyman had "time to think of different "do-over" situations and choose from a list while his life was being threatened." I implied no such thing!

    I don't know Yardif well enough to dislike him, but I find his posts to be silly.--Judge Wasasister

    Quit lying, you know you don't like me. And your professional 'findings', Judge Wasasister, IS what truly matters ... you know that ... because you are Da Judge!

    This will be my last reply on this thread.--Judge Chicken Midol-less Wasasister (JCMW)

    Of course it will be your last reply ... ALAN GOATLESS FRAUDBACKER has arrived to rescue you.

    Yadirf

  • Tallyman
    Tallyman

    Yadirf,

    When you asked me your four, highly personal questions,
    I thought you might half-way be sincere...
    and time prevented my quick response...
    but seeing the vitriol you've directed at my good buddies,
    WASA, Riz and Alan,
    I am not about to accommodate your inquiries, now.

    I've a question for you-
    Why do you have a padlock on your emailbox?
    Others in the forum do as well, but none have asked me
    the sort of morbid kuriosity kwestions you have.

    Since Day One, 8-9 years ago,
    when I went online, even before going on the Internet,
    I have hidden nothing- my name, address, phone number, background,
    etc.,etc. I WANTED people to know who I was when I started exposing
    Watchtower Hypocrisy.

    I respect others' wishes to remain anonymous for various reasons.

    Why do you remain hidden?

    Why didn't you send me those personal questions to my email box which is open and listed in my profile, instead of asking me in this public forum? That way, I would've gotten to find out YOUR email address.

    Hmmm, why do I think your email may be a '.hotmail.com' address?

    When asking your questions, your appearance of pleasantness soon turned stale to sour to downright rancid.

    Now, you can go to Heck.

    .

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit