did Jesus exist and does it matter?

by zen nudist 49 Replies latest watchtower bible

  • seven006
    seven006

    LT,

    Do you think you would be any less kind, or caring, or loving to your child if you did not believe in god?

    I am not putting down good ethics, I never have. My concern is those who only attribute those ethics to an exclusive and absolute correlation to Christian philosophy.

    I do not buy into the biblical philosophy that all human kind was "born into sin" and the only way they can be a decent human is to follow the teachings of Christ. If they believe that and develop good ethics because of it, more power too them. It's easy to follow an example of another. It is a lot harder to develop those ethics and treat others well simply because it is the right thing to do without having to say it's because somebody else told you to do it.

    This stripping you down and then building you up in order to give praise to the person who broke you down so he could build you up, I find controlling and manipulative and tactics use by early leaders to control their people and keep them in a false sense of security based on fear of the unknown. To me, that is the essence of religion. A need to stay unimportant until you are told by someone else that you are worthy to be a decent human.

    You can believe what ever you wish to justify your kindness that is very apparent on this board. It doesn't matter to me. But, I will always question your convictions as well as any other Christians convictions about why and where those convictions are based. Personally mine come from me and not some invisible force written about in controversial and semi-historical based books of myth.

    When it gets right down to it, it doesn't really matter were it comes from just as long it is there.

    Take care,

    Dave

  • LittleToe
    LittleToe

    Hi Dave,

    Have you read my recent posts on the various threads to do with beliefs?

    You've attacked stuff that I've not commented on, hence I suspect that the title "Christian" is confusing you regarding my own.

    I agree that humans will naturally do certain things like look after kids. However we all work to one philosophy or other, regardless of whether that involves a deity or not. You seem to have a downer on any that involve the latter.

    Must be that nasty "sin" thing, interfering again

    Cheers,
    Ross.

  • seven006
    seven006

    LT,

    Yes, I have read your other post on different threads.

    You and I have had shared minor comments about this issue before. I usually stay out of such threads but found some comments in this one worth responding to. My comments are usually meant for other posters to consider instead of just the one I am responding to. We are on different side of the fence on this issue but only slightly. That will never change or influence my opinion of you as a human being. You know I think you are a good guy and always have, in spite of your Christian/ life misunderstandings.

    That's all that matters to me. I like to mess with you not because you are Christian but more because you are British and you like to ware dresses.

    A guy has to have a little fun on this board or he starts to take all this god stuff a little to serious.

    Take care,

    Dave

  • LittleToe
    LittleToe
    We are on different side of the fence on this issue but only slightly.

    So, tell me, who has the picket fence up his rear?
    LOL

    Maybe we should switch roles for a week, and you can do the God stuff, while I have a little more fun than usual

    Hmmm... Maybe not... Gumby would have real cause to call me a b*st*rd, then!
    LOL

  • seven006
    seven006

    I don't know about switching for a week. Would I have to ware one of those cute little plaid skirts? I'm half Irish, does that effect whether my skirt will have stripes or flowers on it?

    I'll give it a try but you'll have to take care of Gumby and Minimus for the week. They're mischievous little guys so you'll have to buy a leash for them. Don't let them near any woman's legs, they get a little weird.

    Dave

  • gumby
    gumby
    Don't let them near any woman's legs, they get a little weird.

    Minimus goes for the legs. Soon as he sidetracks them with the leg thing.....I come in from behind. Were a team dammit!

    LT,

    I admire you for looking into the flip side as you mentioned you are doing at the present concerning the validity of Jesus. I welcome anything you find that can substantiate that he existed. Still the mystery remains however as to his wherabouts for the past two thousand years.

    I'm sorry I called you a bastard cuz I'm thinking about reserving that title solely for "Dave the bastard"

    Actually Dave ol' bud.....I was quite impressed with your reasoning on this thread. As you say....you do not always get involved in these types of debates.........but I thought you did a dern nice job! Your not half the braindead schmuck Craig attributes to you when your not around.

  • seven006
    seven006

    Gum,

    No matter how Christian a person is, you just can't help liking people like LT and Shelby. I lighten up especially for posters like them.

    If they are brain dead and completely stupid like other jesus posters who once in a while pop on to the board and call us nonbelievers swine or stupid, I just fold my napkin and start poking at them with my shrimp cocktail fork.

    It's in our bastard code of ethics to eat over zealous narrow minded religious people for lunch. They are also low on carbs and you get a little sugar rush up around the neck area.

    I'm evil, I can't help it, I was raised in.....well you know.

    Happy new year pal.

    Dave

  • ThiChi
    ThiChi

    "I think Jesus existed but is practically unrelated to the "Christ" character we usually associate him with."

    A lot of people believe this way. Thomas Jefferson viewd himself as a Christian, however, he produced the "Jeffersonian Bible" that took out all the miracles and left in only his teachings.....This Bible is still in circulation today.

  • hooberus
    hooberus

    zen nudist said:
    http://www.impactpress.com/articles/decjan01/jesus120101.html

    check this out and let me know what you think....

    my personal opinion so far, with all that I have learned to date and being out of JW'dom for 13+ years

    is that Jesus likely never existed.

    I think that the arcticle is wrong. The arcticle says:

    For example, the Persian sun-god Mithra, widely worshipped in the Roman Empire before the inception of the Christian era, had 12 disciples, performed miracles, was buried in a tomb, rose on the third day, was called the Good Shepherd, identified with the lamb, considered "the Way, the Truth and the Light, the Redeemer, the Savior, the Messiah;" his principal festival was held on what was to become Easter, and he instituted a Eucharist or Lord's Supper. When Constantine made Christianity the official religion of the Empire in 313 C.E. (Common Era), he was influenced by the pell-mell conversion of Roman soldiers from Mithraism to Christianity. The biblical Jesus gave them a sort of home-grown Mithra.

    For a refutation of these see: http://www.tektonics.org/tekton_04_02_04_MMM.html

    Later, the Evangelists would naturally suppose he was crucified when Pontius Pilate was the prefect of Judea (26 C.E. - 36 C.E.) since Pilate was infamous for his ruthless rule of Judea.

    The crucifixion Of Jesus Christ under Pontius Pilate is a historical fact. Encyclopedia Brittanica Micropaedia Vol. 3 p.762

    "There were various methods of performing the execution. Usually, the condemned man, after being whipped, or "scourged," dragged the crossbeam of his cross to the place of punishment, where the upright shaft was already fixed in the ground. Stripped of his clothing either then or earlier at his scourging, he was bound fast with outstrectched arms to the crossbeam or nailed firmly to it through the wrists. The crossbeam was then raised high against the upright shaft and made fast to it about 9 to 12 feet (approximately 3 metres) from the ground. Next, the feet were tightly bound or nailed to the upright shaft. A ledge inserted about halfway up the upright shaft gave some support to the body; evidence for a similar ledge for the feet is rare and late. Over the criminal's head was placed a notice stating his name and his crime. Death, apparently caused bu exhaustion or by heart failure, could be hastened by shattering the legs (crurifragium) with an iron club, so that shock and asphyxiation soon nded his life."

    The same arcticle later says:

    "in about AD 32 Pontius Pilate had Jesus of Nazareth put to death by crucifixion."

    • The church historian Luke believed that Jesus Christ was a historical person crucified under Pilate himself a historical person.

    "Now in the fifteenth year of the reign of Tiberius Caesar, Pontius Pilate being governor of Judaea, and Herod being tetrarch of Galilee, and his brother Philip tetrarch of Ituraea and of the region of Trachonitis, and Lysanias the tetrarch of Abilene," Luke 3:1

    "Pilate therefore, willing to release Jesus, spake again to them. But they cried, saying, Crucify him, crucify him. And he said unto them the third time, Why, what evil hath he done? I have found no cause of death in him: I will therefore chastise him, and let him go. And they were instant with loud voices, requiring that he might be crucified. And the voices of them and of the chief priests prevailed. And Pilate gave sentence that it should be as they required." Luke 23: 20-24

    • Jewish historian Josephus recorded that Jesus Christ was a historical person crucified under Pilate himself a historical person (some dispute this reference, though the below part is commonly accepted).

    "and when Pilate, at the suggestion of the principal men among us, had condemned him to the cross, those that loved him at the first did not forsake him;"

    • Roman Historian Tacitus (Ad 115 Annals 15.44. ) believed that Jesus Christ was a historical Person crucified under Pilate himself a historical person.

    "But not all the relief that could come from man, not all the bounties that the prince could bestow, nor all the atonements which could be presented to the gods, availed to relieve Nero from the infamy of being believed to have ordered the conflagration, the fire of Rome. Hence to suppress the rumor, he falsely charged with the guilt, and punished Christians, who were hated for their enormities. Christus, the founder of the name, was put to death by Pontius Pilate, procurator of Judea in the reign of Tiberius: but the pernicious superstition, repressed for a time broke out again, not only through Judea, where the mischief originated, but through the city of Rome also, where all things hideous and shameful from every part of the world find their center and become popular. Accordingly, an arrest was first made of all who pleaded guilty; then, upon their information, an immense multitude was convicted, not so much of the crime of firing the city, as of hatred against mankind."

    • Justin Martyr (147 A.D.) appealed to a document apparenty extant in his day called the "Acts of Pontius Pilate" as a historical reference for the fact of the crucifixion of Jesus Christ by Pontius Pilate. Such a document would have been written near the time of the event.

    The First Apology of Justin

    Chapter XXXV.-Other Fulfilled Prophecies.

    And the expression, "They pierced my hands and my feet," was used in reference to the nails of the cross which were fixed in His hands and feet. And after He was crucified they cast lots upon His vesture, and they that crucified Him parted it among them. And that these things did happen, you can ascertain from the Acts of Pontius Pilate. 71

    71 aktwn . These Acts of Pontius Pilate, or regular accounts of his procedure sent by Pilate to the Emporer Tiberius, are supposed to have been destroyed at an early period, possibly in consequence of the unanswerable appeals which the Christians constantly made to them. There exists a forgery in imitation of these Acts. See Trollope. For some of the other claims see: http://www.tektonics.org/tekton_01_01_01.html

  • Narkissos
    Narkissos

    ThiChi: I agree with you that there is no point in trying to correct the Bible on a historical basis. The historical Jesus is simply not the Christian "Christ", and his accurate biography would never amount to a "gospel" (Schweitzer and Bultmann's conclusions already, from two different perspectives). The best respect we can give to the Biblical texts is to read them as they are -- that is, as literature; not expecting them to be historically accurate and not rejecting them when we find they are not. On this standpoint many "believers" and "unbelievers" might easily agree. What always amazes me is the reluctance of most believers to admit that the material basis for their faith is literary (or scriptural), not historical.

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit