OK ok....don't bite at the "apostate" label. But recently someone on here told me that disaffected/inactive/d/f JWs now must out number JWs as a whole.
I (funny enough) disagreed. Does anyone have proof otherwise? I realise that JWs who have left don't keep the same stringent figures as does the WT as regards Active (publishers) and Memorial attendees!! , and some allowance must be made for a very slight minority that overlap, but, But do you really believe that in 2004 that there are indeed more ex/inactive JWs than there are active/memorial attendees? There is a grey area I know.
Thoughts?
Scoob