LOL
Ya know, I can't help but find it amusing to see that the comments by "rationalists", on this thread, resort to analogies about alien races (complete with examples of potential languages). Apparently that (and probably inter-dimensional beings) is much more acceptable to accept than "God".
Setting aside a theist viewpoint, it seems a given that there are certain absolutes, not least in the sphere of physics.
The sun rises and sets. The stars move in prescribed motions. The Periodic Table of Elements holds true regardless of what part of the globe (and probably the universe - though that's an assumption, right?) you live in.
Even taking it to a psychological level, it appears that humans seem to hold certain things in common [sense], such as rights and wrongs regarding property rights.
To disregard such things surely places ourselves in the role of "God", as the center of our own imagined universe, where everything revolves around that which we are conscious consciously?
Ergo sum (or if you prefer an alternative - Cognito ergo sum), but what about those that we interact with. Are we merely deluding ourselves? If so, I am really the only one who exists here, and am currently condiucting a conversation with my own sick mind, that has generated all these personality constructs, such as exemplified by all the "Users" of JWD and the Intenet at large, far less the "real" world that I spend far more of my time interacting with.
Back to a theist viewpoint. It appears that that is one of the main arguments levelled at theists is their belief of their "imaginary friend", even though these individuals behave in an otherwise totally rational manner.
That sounds kinda selective, to me.