Gumby, have you tried e-mailing God to get an answer to your question? After all, he is the source! Even if he doesn't reply at least you won't get a conjectured answer. Just having fun.
Guest 77
by gumby 297 Replies latest watchtower beliefs
Gumby, have you tried e-mailing God to get an answer to your question? After all, he is the source! Even if he doesn't reply at least you won't get a conjectured answer. Just having fun.
Guest 77
Began wondering why Eve never addressed his snake???????????
mac
Gumby:
After the PM I got, he can go swivel...
He's welcome to his opinions, but there was little excuse for the kind of offense he caused...
Gumby,
That was right decent and gentlemanly of you, and I respect you for it. Thank you. It makes me feel bad about not having chosen my words more carefully in this thread. I will be more careful from now on.
_____________________________
Little Toe,
The entire purpose of a "PM" is privacy. That's what the "P" stands for is "Private". You publicly alluded to something I said to you in private via of "Private Message". Interestingly you avoided mentioning what you had said to me via your PM reply. I would ask that you respect the principle of privacy, or otherwise you defete the purpose of the PM option we have here. Perhaps I'm mistaken, and the "PM" means "Personal Message" instead. If so, "my mistake". In either case, whether "private" or "personal" I think it equates with the idea of privacy.
_____________________________
Gumby again, and others:
I really want this thread to continue on because it's such an intriguing subject, and I thank Gumby for starting it. It will be at least Sunday, and maybe Monday, before I myself will be able to participate in it again as I am about to leave town for a day or two. Please enjoy it in the meantime.
Thanks,
Schizm
Schizm:
It stands for "Personal Message", but nonetheless, I dont post the contents of messages. I view them as "Private", too.
I agree, it's an intriguing subject.
I'm glad to see that you are playing reasonably nicely, now. I hope that continues.
Whilst that's the case my work is done...
Whilst that's the case my work is done...
No it ain't! You can't just up and walk out on me that way ya bastardio
I need yer help on stuff like this! If you leave like that.....I'll......I'll........I'll make fun of your dress if you bring it
I'm glad all is OK. I thank Schizm for overlooking my airheadedness and accepting my apology, and all the others who aided in giving some perspectives to look at. I don't think we ever answered the question for all to see and agree upon, but we did make ourselves consider the question and made ourselves consider how we feel about it. Some have never really thought about it before. Some may have given others a new way to look at things for the better.....if so, that's good.
Gumby
schizm,
: I really want this thread to continue on because it's such an intriguing subject,
This thread will die as quickly as the latest Watchtower Doctrine(tm) if you don't answer my simple questions, you devious, manipulative twit. You cannot expect to keep this thread alive if you don't deal with the issues that were slapped on your silly face and that that you ignored or sidestepped.
Animated GIFS of dogs humping someone's leg is NOT what we consider to be a rational answer in here, you nitwit twit.
Farkel
see below.
schizm again shows it's stupidity by this statement:
: When it comes to a showdown, you'll find everytime that Farkel and AlanF are wimps. AlanF totally avoided addressing the points I had made in one of my posts addressed to him.
Exactly WHICH points were those schizm? Please be specific.
: The reason he did is because he couldn't deal with it honestly without having to admit that I was right.
Before you break your arm patting yourself on the back, answer my first question in this post: exactly WHICH points are you talking about?
: With regards to Farkel: he initially wanted to change the subject of this thread over to the subject of the "ransom" (with a little help from YOU). And after having succeeded in doing so, right off the bat he insisted on arguing about the meaning of the word "reply" ... disagreeing with the dictionary's definition of the word.
I showed the world that you are fool who cannot understand the difference between a reply and an answer, and you never rebutted my argument. Your "reply" was an animated GIF with a dog humping someone's leg. Do you realize how STUPID and unfunny you look with a reply like that?
: It's quite obvious that all Farkel wanted to do is to derail the thread, one way or another.
Gumby started this thread and YOU tried to derail it. Don't place any blame on me for same. Look at yourself. YOU started this. It was not YOUR thread that was derailed, you fool. You chose to derail someone else's thread yourself, and then blame people like me for what you did. The whole thinking world is laughing at your silly ass, fool.
You want your own thread derailed? Then post your own silly-assed topic and watch it get chopped to pieces. I'll be the first in line, but I'll have a lotta more peoples behind me. Fool.
Maybe we should let Gumby who started this thread tell us who derailed this thread, and who's the fool. Nah! He's too nice to do that!
Farkel
Farkel,
Must I remind you of what I said to you previously?
You really leave me with no logical reason for continuing this discussion [with YOU].--SchizmYou've given me no reason for changing my mind.