A Review By Carl Jonsson Of Rolf Furuli'sBook On Chronology. (page 4)

hippikon

Pigs Fly

Hippikon ( BA, QBE, BSA, MA)

(Bullshit Artist, Qualified By Experience, Bronze Swimming Award, Meddling Armature)

Now to do something meaninfull with my life - Whats for dinner?

AlanF

Non-scholar said:

: In point of fact I know nothing about Faulstich

Precisely my point. Nor do you know anything about anything significant about "Bible chronology". Which is why if you had any brains you'd shut up.

You continually make a fool of yourself and your religion by shooting off your mouth about things you're totally ignorant of. Please do keep it up. It makes my job so much easier.

AlanF

Leolaia

scholar says:

All scholars have their scholarship peer reviewed. When scholars submit and article to a recognized journal for publication, the editor of the journal submits copies to other referees prior to publication. A literature review is part and parcel of the academic process and is the appropriate course especially when such research is new or controversial or seeks to advance the scholarship.

Since you are a scholar, may I ask what publications you have produced, or have you not published yet?

hillary_step

Scholar,

Whether the Jonsson hypothesis is favorable or not is besides the point and would not influence my opinion as to its overall aim which is to discredit and disprove 607.

I see that I backed you into yet another corner that clearly indicates that you are not a 'truth-seeker' but merely working to a pre-fixed agenda and are prepared to bend whatever facts need to be bent in order to bolster this agenda.

There is no point arguing with an agenda.

Best regards - HS

PS - I am well aware of the methodology of peer reviews. I have a degree in English ( from a real University ) and have been published in my own discipline many more times than you have, I am sure.

hillary_step

Scholar,

In point of fact I know nothing about Faulstich because to date I have not read his research but one day I will buy his book.

What can I say?...LOL....and you have the audacity to call Alan a clown!

Best regards - HS

scholar

Alan F

So what. I do not claim to have read every book published on chronology, Or have you? One thing is certain my postings on this board always get your attention..

scholar

hilary_step

If anyone has an agenda it is Jonsson and this is plainly evident in the introduction to his editions of GTR. If you have published then you appreciate the importance of a review so get Jonsson off his backside and get it done.

scholar

larc

Scholar, Johonssen was not the first persson do bring up these dates. Most Bible scholars believee it was 537, not 607. Name one reference outside of the Witness world that says otherwise. Frankly, I don't care in either case. What affects me are all the failed prohecies, from the late 1800's to the present days. Shall I name those dates for you??????

hillary_step

Larc,

Long time no read! How are you doing?

Name one reference outside of the Witness world that says otherwise.

Well, this is the kind of question Scholar tends to ignore. Apparently athiests and agnostics, will never understand why the WTS chooses 607BCE as its date because they are Godless, archaeologists, historians and true scholars will never understand because they are not Jehovah's Witnesses, and Carl Jonsson who collated the work of the latter will never understand because he disagrees with King Rolf of the tribe of Furuli. It is a little like the Zulu wars, without the Zulu's and without a war.

I think I have covered all the bases here.

Best regards - HS

toreador

When it all boils down to brass tax, why would we need to figure out bible phrophecy to pinpoint a date 1800/1900 years after the bible was written and have to use "secular" unearthed archaelogical findings to do it? Is it just me that thinks this is peculiar or do others feel the same way?

Tor

A Review By Carl Jonsson Of Rolf Furuli'sBook On Chronology.

Share this