Jst2Laws:
What a great thread!
Like you, I was a convert--not born-in-it. In many respects I think it is a different experience for converts.
At age 18, after "back-sliding" from "the Truth" in the mainstream fundamentalist "born-again" denominations (Church of Christ and Baptist genres), by going to movies (Walt Disney's Cinderella), wearing lipstick, and getting a part-time job as an usherette in a movie theatre, I believed with all sincerity that I was doomed to spend eternity being tortured in a burning hell. That is the belief of people who adhere to hell-fire doctrine denominations. So people just have to excuse me that I don't consider Jehovah's Witnesses to be the worst belief system in religion. :-)
Believing that I was doomed, I never-the-less loved the Creator and goodness, and did not blame God for my failure to be "good." I wanted to work to save as many souls from going to eternal torture (Hell) as possible. I was looking for the one "true religion" to serve God and goodness, even though I was doomed for Hell (since there remained no more sacrifice for me--I had known the truth and returned to my wicked ways (Heb.10:26) for going to movies, working in a theater, and wearing makeup, etc.--age 17-18).
When I heard that JWs did not believe in War and Christmas (I had concluded that Jesus and Santa Claus had nothing in common), I contacted them. I began a study with two other "pioneer" converts, and the first topic we covered was Hell. I studied that topic very deeply, with great interest, and to this day it amazes me how un-studied most JWs/exJWs are on that subject. That was THE subject I had to be convinced of before considering the religion's other doctrines. With studies daily, lasting hours each day, I was convinced this was IT within 3 weeks. I attended my first assembly--a district assembly with Knorr and FredFranz and Covington, etc. within a month, and was baptized at my first district assembly within 3 months. My mentor thought it was premature for me to be baptized because she said I did not fully comprehend the meaning that this was "Jehovah's organization". I now realize--though she did not realize it--that she meant I had not come under the mindset of accepting everything without question. I was not under the mind control. That early baptism may be what kept me from going under it.
Early on, I began to notice with dismay that JWs did not "prove" everything that came out in the Watchtower. JWs who were raised in the religion did not "prove" anything--they just accepted. They believed with all faith at that time that the Watchtower never had wrong information. It was not to be questioned. I was amazed that many life-time JWs could not disprove the basic doctrines that had been disproved to me in my "studies". The first thing that bothered me was the "blind faith." After a couple years of enthusiasm, I drifted into "waiting for new light" and over the next 16 years a gradual withdrawl that finally ended when a certain situation that was certain to result in a sister being DF'd, and I woke up. No more waiting for "new light"--I finally had to admit to myself this religion was not "the Truth". It was not a welcome or easy admission. I had really wanted it to be "the Truth". I had a log of egg on my face for people I had "witnessed to" and practically condemned.
I'm one who is glad I was a JW, glad I had that experience. Otherwise I would have believed it could not happen to me. Yes, intelligent people can believe incredible things. I once did a seminar at a BRCI conference, with a group of embittered exJWs, in which I posed questions in three categories: 1) Sorry I was a JW; 2) Not sorry I was a JW; and 3) Glad I was a JW.
The questions in "Sorry I was a JW" had things like missed education, missed popular activities in school, could have had a better job, etc. The questions in "Not sorry" were along the line of: I might have gotten an education but didn't know at that age what I wanted to be; most people don't do the things they can look back on and see they should have done; we probably would not have made the right decisions or any better decisions, etc. The last category "Glad I was a JW" had questions like, I would not have met my mate, or had my children; I might have gone to war and killed people--or had children or loved ones who did. Or got wounded/crippled. I might have gotten mixed up in drugs or immorality, etc.
The bottom-line question being, do people who were never JWs really, on average, live that much better of a life? Don't we all--JWs, exJWs, never-been-JWs--tend to look back and wish we had made different decisions. Would our decisions have really been the better life we now imagine we would have led if we had not been a JW. To my great surprise, and those who were in the workshop, the winning category turned out to be "Glad I was a JW" (and left, of course).
Some problems I see with people coming out of a long life of JWism is that they become convinced they missed a lot. Most that I see tend to embrace some other ideology (religious, anti-religious, social, amoral, or political). They nurture a concept that they would have had a wonderful life if they had not been a JW (in spite of the fact that most non-JWs do not have an extraordinary wonderful life). Sure we MIGHT have pursued some better education and career opportunties, but don't forget the bad stuff that we stayed away from too. Which is better? Who can say.
In my opinion, I think the luckiest people are people who were JWs, left JWs, and make the best of the rest of their life for what they learned from the experience. Some get better educations after leaving than they would have if they had never been JWs. We have the opportunity to have insight that only people who have succumbed to a mind-control ideology can understand.
Besides, my best friends in this world are exJWs. And the only way to be an exJW is to first be a JW. :-)
Blessings,
~Ros