Sometimes I Hate Being The Father Of Teenagers . . .

by Corvin 61 Replies latest jw friends

  • BeautifulGarbage
    BeautifulGarbage
    But if it's an area where reasonable people can disagree, then why not allow the kid--especially a teenager, and even more so a 17-year-old--to make their own decision?

    Oh, they can disagree all they want. I may be a "strict" parent, but I don't deny my children their opinions, and that I don't consider them in my decisions. I do. However, if I think it's offensive, it's not being played in my house. Avishai made a good point about there being other children, especially younger ones, that would have to be exposed to it. Which is the situation in my home.

    I know that I cannot completely isolate them from some of the violent, vulgar, sexist, and degrading music that out in the world. But, I'm not going to validate its existence by allowing it into my home. If the 17 year old wants to hear it so badly, he/she can wait until they are 18 and out of the house.

  • Corvin
    Corvin
    She's in a band and some of the music they play and listen to is objectionable but I would never destroy it.I ask her to listen to it with headphones so my son cant hear it-but that's the only rule I lay down since she showed me her song writing and poetry which was angst ridden and similar....if it's in their minds it needs an outlet...

    Look, I am not opposed to music, culture, art, new and interesting interpretations . . . variations on a theme. I go to music shows, I perform in music shows. The bands I don't like, I don't go spend my hard-earned dollar to listen to. I don't buy their CD's, and based on the so-called music some of them push on kids, I certainly would not read their poetry. They've already shown me everything I needed to know about them and they are not welcome in my house in any form or medium. They are not welcome to associate and influence my kids either.

    Chris Farley said, in Tommy Boy, "you can slap a guarantee on a box of shit, but it is still a box of shit" or something like that. The point is, we don't bring garbage into the house, we take it out to the street where it gets picked up and left at the dump to decompose . . . and that's what some so-called music simply is: de-compositions.

    The angst my daughter might be identifying with is something we get to have a dialogue about in a safe family atmosphere. We get it out in the open and we help her get past is through various forms of posative feedback, maybe even counselling, and an exchange of posative ideas and a set of actions she can take to get out of her pain. She doesn't get to wallow in it with a bunch of punk-ass bar chord playing sellouts peddling angst as the answer to her pain who couldn't give a shit about her. They, some of them, are classically trained but choose to dish out garbage and mind candy just to pander to a lost bunch of kids and get paid, and my daughter and so many other kids are the suckers who pay them.

    I find much evidence as to the power music has over a human's emotional states. Don't think so? Music in various forms has been ever present in the forground and background of movies, theatrics, cults, politics, book burnings, dances, clubs, witch burnings, Rome burnings, olympic events, baptisms, funerals, parades, sunsets and sunrises. It is used because it has the power to lift up or tear down. To inspire and motivate for good or for evil. I think I will be keeping an ear to my kids bedroom door when they play their selections. It is a good way to know where they are in their heads.

  • reboot
    reboot

    I'm still not spelling or forming sentances or remembering words very well, but bear with me Corvin.A lot of your sentances atart with 'I' ...but we're not talking about your likes-we're talking about your daughter's likes which you decided to censor.I understand the need for rules based on what the parent thinks appropriate for their child..I dont let my kids eat fast food for example, based on the fact that t's bad for them. I understand your view is that the type of music you deem unhealthy for your kids' minds is not entering your house, and I also understand that you feel I don't imagine it evokes emotion in my children?

    I know it does . im pleased it does but I dont feel music that parents may find offensive should automatically be banned and that their reactions will be negative beacuse mine are....

    Objectional lyrics are unpalatable because sometimes theyre too close to reality to be comfortable to listen to.I want my children to grow to hav ambition above that of yearning wealth and status.I want my children to develop and aspire to having a social concience,

    Music that may seem objectional may have a very strong social message and is rarely embraced by the pre-ceeding generation....Censorship in my view, once my children have reached a certain mental maturity is not a good idea.

    I feel we need to allow our children to experience, in a safe way, through music, literature and poetry, the social climate they live in so thye will have an opinion that was formed by their choices.

    Perhaps it' s another culture difference..here in the UK ..we say what we want to whom we want in what ever medium we want and our children are used to shocking views in the art/ media world,so censorship to me in what ever form once our children are mature enough,seems as though it's moving a step backwards.

  • bigboi
    bigboi

    Corvin:

    I think it's good that you are encouraging your kids to be diverse as far as music is concerned. In areas like that having a standard to adhere can be quite beneficial and help them to broaden their taste in music. I think it's also good that you stood your ground with her. It really does help to have parents with a backbone.

  • reboot
    reboot

    I have a back bone..it can be rigid, but not inflexable.

  • bigboi
    bigboi
    have a back bone..it can be rigid, but not inflexable.

    Just for the record. I've only read Corvin's original post in this thread.

    However I think it's extremely important that parents not waffle on issues such as these. Kids can do pretty much anything they want to nowadays if they are so inclined. Therefore, i think it is appropiate that they have very clear definable standards so that they know what is expected of them.

  • reboot
    reboot

    I agree:) we all want to bring up our beautiful children well...our rules will differ but ultimately we can only do what we feel to be the 'right ' way..

  • Abaddon
    Abaddon

    Corvin

    I didn't mention my 18 year-old stepson.

    However, I am not the parent they live with. They live with the JW mum... and they tell me all the stuff they don't tell her because I react in a reasonable way. And I don't think you are normally unreasonable; it's certainly not the impression I've got from your posts.

    That does not mean they get away with blue murder with me either, by the way.

    My point about NIN, Nirvana, etc. wasn't re. your policy of censoring their music. It was about whether you practise what you preach in terms of appropriate music... of should that be 'music that debases'.

    If you will argue you are old enough not to be influenced by music, drive to work listening to Appetite for Destruction, and then borrow a shiny drinks coaster by The Lighthouse Family and do the same. Time your trips. If there's a difference, then maybe you need to follow your own council!

    Oh, your actions with the guru were top notch, but that didn't really answer my question.

    Do you read all their books? To be consistent, you should, even if it's a bother. Likewise, do you screen all their TV viewing? Just censoring their music because you can hear it when you go by their rooms still leaves plenty of scope for violence.

    Oh... and don't let her read Sylvia Plath, or most other poetry for a start!

    I also wonder if you make sure your kids don't watch violent movies.

    If you do let them watch them, I'm sure they have already discussed the contradiction between themselves (as they will have if you listen to violent music).

    Thing with kids is "yes dad" doesn't neccesarily mean they agree or even respect your opinion, as you've found out with the navel piercing.

    Do you think if you were more willing to enter into a genuine discussion your daughter would have acted this way? Or was it her fear you'd just say no, because you can, without considering it that lead to the deceit? Oh, and if she'll do that with her navel, she'll do that with the CD and I doubt you'll know it until she has her own place and she makes sure it's playing when you come in...

    I'd rather be unhappy knowing she was doing something (within reason) I had doubts about than not know she was doing the same thing.

    However, I do feel you're an excellent father, albeit different from me, and I do realise there is no one right way of raising kids, so just take this as a bar-room conversation.

  • Corvin
    Corvin
    I didn't mention my 18 year-old stepson. However, I am not the parent they live with. They live with the JW mum... and they tell me all the stuff they don't tell her because I react in a reasonable way. And I don't think you are normally unreasonable; it's certainly not the impression I've got from your posts.

    When my children were living with their JW mother and stepfather, I got to hear about all the restrictions, the hypocrisy, the double standards, etc. . . . I am determined to make sure they now have some semblance of a normal life . . . but what is normal anyway? She has been given much freedom and lattitude in her choices and preferences and you don't know anything.

    Have you never had to set boundaries and stood your ground with your 18 yo stepson even though it makes you want to cry and give in when they react with hatred and disrespect, harsh words and manipulation tactics that only a teenager could throw at a parent they are confident that loves them so much just to get their way. I have stood my ground with my kids eventhough it nearly broke my heart. I know I have done the right thing when at length that child comes back to me in tears and apologizes, admitting to their temporary insanity while throwing their arms around me in regret and sorrow. A kid will sometimes resort to most hurtful tactics to get what they want.

    We are talking about music that sets a tone contrary to the atmosphere my Mary and I work our asses off to create in this house. Nobody gets to bring anything into this house that underminds that, not even me.

    My point about NIN, Nirvana, etc. wasn't re. your policy of censoring their music. It was about whether you practise what you preach in terms of appropriate music... of should that be 'music that debases'. If you will argue you are old enough not to be influenced by music, drive to work listening to Appetite for Destruction, and then borrow a shiny drinks coaster by The Lighthouse Family and do the same. Time your trips. If there's a difference, then maybe you need to follow your own council!

    What ARE you talking about?

    Do you read all their books? To be consistent, you should, even if it's a bother. Likewise, do you screen all their TV viewing? Just censoring their music because you can hear it when you go by their rooms still leaves plenty of scope for violence.

    As a matter of fact, I am current on all of their reading materials. If they are reading a book I have already read, the situation lends itself to some pretty awesome conversations and stimulating dialogue. If I have not read a book they are reading, chances are that Mary has. Otherwise, I at least read reviews or summaries of the material if time does not permit me to read the entire publication. I do not object to controversial material when it goes a bit further than just vile language and solutionless angst.

    Oh... and don't let her read Sylvia Plath, or most other poetry for a start!

    Now you're just being a smart-ass. Sylvia Plaths works tell a profound story. Plath's literary accomplishments contrast with her inability to manage her emotional states of mind and her personal relationships. I can educate my kids with a story like this, but how do you elaborate and expand a child's mind with lyrics, that first of all, make no sense and are a plagiarized clutter of cliches and buzz-words that emerge from the hectic static of bar chords like cryptic messages aimed at baffled youth. It is too gay for words and not based in any sort of reality. I've listened to these songs and I have asked my daughter to elaborate on its meaning. She can expand and speak of many things when it comes to real poetry and music, but is suddenly at a loss of intelligent thought and speech when it comes to that garbage. 'Nuff said.

    I also wonder if you make sure your kids don't watch violent movies. If you do let them watch them, I'm sure they have already discussed the contradiction between themselves (as they will have if you listen to violent music).

    I have MTV blocked on both TV sets in our home. I sit and watch VH-1 with them. We watch movies that contain violence. The thing about movies that contain violence is that the antagonist usually gets what they deserve and their demise is so blatantly justified that even a mindless person can get it, and dialogue can and usually does insue about the reality and likelyhood of such behavior. No such dialogue will come about with some of the music my daughter has chosen.

    Thing with kids is "yes dad" doesn't neccesarily mean they agree or even respect your opinion, as you've found out with the navel piercing.

    They rarely do when it comes to doing something you say no to.

    Do you think if you were more willing to enter into a genuine discussion your daughter would have acted this way? Or was it her fear you'd just say no, because you can, without considering it that lead to the deceit? Oh, and if she'll do that with her navel, she'll do that with the CD and I doubt you'll know it until she has her own place and she makes sure it's playing when you come in... I'd rather be unhappy knowing she was doing something (within reason) I had doubts about than not know she was doing the same thing.

    Heh, heh, what you have yet to learn is that no matter what you do, how you do it, how you say what you say, or how much of a pal you try to be to your kids, you ultimately have to be the parent, sometimes what they perceive as their greatest enemy, no matter how you try to explain, communicate, reason or hold out such a prospect for them at a more appropriate age, they will rebel and test the boundaries. They will sometimes make foolish dissapointing decisions based on their inexperience and unrealistic expectations of life and people (usually propagated to them by garbage mediums in music and TV) and do the opposite of what you ask and expect. Reasonableness does not include consenting to whatever they want during the whimsicle years of their teenage life. What she does when she is out of the house and on her own, I am sure will for the most part, reflect the values and love she received from her parents while she was at home. I suppose I won't have much to say about it when she is on her own, now will I? There is, regrettably, when no amount of reason or intelligent dialogue will reach the heart of you kid, and upon seeing this, you just have to say "no", mean it and hope like hell they don't go behind your back.

    However, I do feel you're an excellent father, albeit different from me, and I do realise there is no one right way of raising kids, so just take this as a bar-room conversation.

    Here's to you and your kid. I wish you lots of success. Let me know how things are going in a couple years.

    Corvin

  • Corvin
    Corvin

    Hi reboot!

    A lot of your sentances atart with 'I' ...

    So do yours and everyone else's.

    but we're not talking about your likes-we're talking about your daughter's likes which you decided to censor.
    It's not her likes I am censoring. She can like what she wants, but there are limits as to which of those likes she can bring into the house. You said it yourself.
    I understand the need for rules based on what the parent thinks appropriate for their child..I dont let my kids eat fast food for example, based on the fact that t's bad for them. I understand your view is that the type of music you deem unhealthy for your kids' minds is not entering your house, and I also understand that you feel I don't imagine it evokes emotion in my children?

    I know it does . im pleased it does but I dont feel music that parents may find offensive should automatically be banned and that their reactions will be negative beacuse mine are....

    With that one statement you have just invalidated mine and yours and everyone else's role as a parent. I and my wife, Mary, get to set the standard for what is acceptablein this house, not my kids, not you, not Dead Poetic, and the case of this household, my kids have the added benefit of open dialogue replete with opinions and viewpoints . . . all to be considered and respected. My respecting my daughter's likes does not have to include the permitting of the eliment to have a home in my home.

    Objectional lyrics are unpalatable because sometimes theyre too close to reality to be comfortable to listen to.I want my children to grow to hav ambition above that of yearning wealth and status.I want my children to develop and aspire to having a social concience, Music that may seem objectional may have a very strong social message and is rarely embraced by the pre-ceeding generation....Censorship in my view, once my children have reached a certain mental maturity is not a good idea.

    I feel we need to allow our children to experience, in a safe way, through music, literature and poetry, the social climate they live in so thye will have an opinion that was formed by their choices.

    Read the above response about Sylvia Plath versus some of the music selections she chooses.

    Perhaps it' s another culture difference..here in the UK ..we say what we want to whom we want in what ever medium we want and our children are used to shocking views in the art/ media world,so censorship to me in what ever form once our children are mature enough,seems as though it's moving a step backwards.
    Good for you and the UK, although I don't think that statement is wholey true. Good solid principles are timeless, however. Music, poetry, whatever, is a rehash of everything that has ever been said or done before. Nothing new. I get to choose, for now, how my kids get educated about social issues, sex, drugs, relationships and work. We watch TV and read the Times, and I encourage them to read through the lines and offer them more ways to see. The social views and angst of teen composers is nothing but a strain on the truth . . . and Bob Dillon, the most revered poet regarding the social and political issues of his day was nothing more than a plagiarist it turns out. If you want your kids to learn and identify with social issues through such mediums, fine. In the meantime I will point out to my kids the bullshit in most of it, as well as the bullshit in mainstream media. Best Regards, Corvin

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit