The FBI Is Accused of Spying On Certain Religious Groups!!!

by minimus 48 Replies latest jw friends

  • Happy Guy :)
    Happy Guy :)

    The JW who did my mother's funeral talk was jailed in Western Canada (Saskatchewan) during WWII because of the ban on JW's.

    I am currently trying to gather more information about this ban during WWII. I was well aware of the strange character in Quebec but I previously was not aware of a specific ban against JWs in WWII.

    Was the ban during WWII a ban directed specifically at JWs or was it rather a blanket or general ban against any distribution by anyone (regardless of religious affiliation) of what would be considered material which would be anti-Government or subversive to Government decrees and laws (i.e. the draft)? I have not found anything specific on this yet so I would be very interested to know.

  • acsot
    acsot

    Happy Guy: where have you been looking? See garybuss' post above as for the Yearbook references. I could look it up in the Proclaimer's book or on the CD-ROM but I don't have internet access at home and so it'll have to wait until Monday when I'm back here at the office (if I remember to bring in the info). How long were you a JW? I thought it was pretty common knowledge about the ban.

    I remember a CO in the early 80s trying to put the fear of the big A into the audience by telling not to become complacent and live a comfortable lifestyle, since it was Canada that had acted so quickly during the war years (Second World War) in banning "Jehovah's people", even ahead of the U.S., and that everyone in attendance should do their utmost to attend all meetings, do personal study, yada yada yada, in order not to falter when our faith was to be tested "at any time now" since the great tribulation was "right around the corner".

  • heathen
    heathen

    garybus--- I know I've seen in recent literature , I think the revelation book that specifically state that christians are not involved with the over throw of man made government but that God himself will take care of it in his own time .There is enmity between the seeds but the seed of christ is to fight only with propaganda .

  • garybuss
    garybuss

    Heathen, I don't get any current literature. God's channel cancelled my subscription. You might post the passages. Sounds interesting. Thanks!

  • codeblue
    codeblue

    Yes I could imagine them spying on the JW's.......they have funds worth billions............

    I think the FBI should spy on them....they are very suspicious!

  • heathen
    heathen

    garybus--- REVELATION GRAND CLIMAX chapter 39 pg. 279

  • stillajwexelder
    stillajwexelder

    It is a known fact and was published a few years ago, MI5 and MI6 spied and infiltrated JWs

  • garybuss
    garybuss

    Thanks Heathen, Considering core doctrine has been changed and the Watch Tower joined the United Nations to get a free library card since the Revelation book was printed I wonder what it might mean today. It's god's war but remember this god works through a United States bases book printing business represented by untrained volunteers distributing outdated religious literature printed on recycled paper who claim in print that they are not pacifists and would be willing to go to war when directed by god (read Society).

    I would much rather my son were a Jehovah's Witness playing pacifist and shunning me rather than laying in some gutter in Iraq dead.

    I think the Witnesses need watching not because they may raise up and start their own war, I think they need to be watched because they are accumulating wealth using dishonest recruiting practices, coercion of members, and unethical tax avoidance.

    The Witnesses are NOT neutral politically. They are in opposition to any (other) government in office and by that attitude they fit the profile of an enemy of the government. They are actually an enemy to the IDEA of (other) governments. These are not people who will cooperate for the benefit of the country or neighborhoods. These are people who resist the establishment represented by business, religion, and government while accepting (fighting for) benefits offered by those elements of the establishment.

    A fact that makes the Witness group so interesting to me is their ability to deny what they are doing while they are openly doing it like the avoidance of sales tax with the exchange of printed literature for a "suggested" donation. A suggestion is a subtle command.

    Heathen, maybe I missed your point. If I did, please let me know. What are your thoughts about what I wrote above? GaryB


  • heathen
    heathen

    garybus --- One thing I'm sure of is that I've never seen in print the statement you made about the j-dubs going to war if commanded by God . I've read plenty of the literature and everything I've read leads me to conclude that they are pacifists whether or not they put the word in print . To them they have beaten their swords to plow shears and turned their head away from violence .

    All I can really say is what I'm finding out on the web from ex members , I wasn't in the ORG . I can also comment on the many publications I've actually read . They do believe that the governments are satanic and that they are wheat amongst the weeds , that kinda stuff . I don't think there is a law against saying such things in the USA . If there is it's unconstitutional anyway and they are entitled to freedom of the press and speech just like anybody else . The switching from the use of set amount to donations was a tactic to avoid taxation and is probly legal , I haven't seen anything from credible sources that say it isn't . corporations always use legal loopholes . They also believe they are acting for the benefit of mankind by teaching the gospel and warning people of the day of Gods vengence . I agree they are hypocrites but since when was there a law against that ? The government is run by hypocrites .

  • garybuss
    garybuss




    Should Christians Be Pacifists? ***
    Is it Scripturally correct, however, to describe Jehovah?s Witnesses as pacifists? To clarify the matter, it may depend on what is meant by the word ?pacifist.? Butler used the term to commend the Witnesses for their bravery in refusing, at great personal cost, to take up arms in warfare. Sadly, though, many people who are caught up in the fever of war see a pacifist only as ?a coward or a traitor, who [is] anxious to shirk his responsibility to his nation.? Is that viewpoint correct?

    Opposition to War or Violence

    Webster?s Ninth New Collegiate Dictionary says that a pacifist is someone who is ?strongly and actively opposed to conflict and esp[ecially] war.? It defines ?pacifism? as ?opposition to war or violence as a means of settling disputes; specif[ically]: refusal to bear arms on moral or religious grounds.? How would these definitions apply to the believers of the early Christian congregation?

    They did ?refuse to bear arms on moral and religious grounds? and avoided all ?conflict and war.? Why? Because they knew that Jesus had said that his followers were ?no part of the world? and that ?all those who take the sword will perish by the sword.? (John 15:19; Matthew 26:52) In The Early Church and the World, one historian tells us that ?up to the reign of Marcus Aurelius at least [161-180 C.E.], no Christian would become a soldier after his baptism.? In The New World?s Foundations in the Old, another says: ?The first Christians thought it was wrong to fight, and would not serve in the army even when the Empire needed soldiers.?

    The Christians? commission was to preach the good news. (Matthew 24:14; 28:19, 20) They understood that they had no commission from God to wage war against his enemies, to act as God?s executioners, as it were. (Matthew 5:9; Romans 12:17-21) Only when so-called Christians ?depart far from the teaching of Christ,? as Butler stated, do they get enmeshed in the wars of the nations. Then the clergy bless armies and pray for victory, often on both sides of a conflict. (Compare John 17:16; 18:36.) In past centuries, for example, Protestants and Catholics fought many bloody wars, resulting in ?the horrors that [descended] on Western Europe, both sides proclaiming themselves as the instruments of God?s wrath,? writes Kenneth Clark in his book Civilisation. The arguments made to justify this kind of warfare, says McClintock and Strong?s Cyclopedia of Biblical, Theological, and Ecclesiastical Literature, ?have evidently grown out of a desire to conciliate the civil power, and are clearly opposed to the ancient Christian doctrine and to the whole spirit of the Gospel.?James 4:4.

    Totally Opposed to War?

    Were ?the ancient Christian doctrine and the whole spirit of the Gospel? really pacifist, however? Could early Christians truly be described as pacifists, as defined previously? No! Why not? For one thing, they recognized God?s right to wage war. (Exodus 14:13, 14; 15:1-4; Joshua 10:14; Isaiah 30:30-32) Besides that, they never disputed God?s right to authorize ancient Israel to fight for him when that nation served as his sole instrument on earth.Psalm 144:1; Acts 7:45; Hebrews 11:32-34.

    God has not only a right but also an obligation on the basis of justice to remove wicked people from the earth. Many evildoers will never respond to God?s patient appeals to them to mend their ways. (Isaiah 45:22; Matthew 7:13, 14) God?s toleration of evil has limits. (Isaiah 61:2; Acts 17:30) Christians, therefore, recognize that in the end God will forcibly remove evil people from the earth. (2 Peter 3:9, 10) As the Bible foretells, this will be at ?the revelation of the Lord Jesus from heaven with his powerful angels in a flaming fire, as he brings vengeance upon those who do not know God and those who do not obey the good news about our Lord Jesus.?2 Thessalonians 1:6-9.

    The last book of the Bible describes this conflict as ?the war of the great day of God the Almighty,? or Armageddon. (Revelation 16:14, 16) It says that Jesus Christ will take the lead in this, that he ?carries on war in righteousness.? (Revelation 19:11, 14, 15) Jesus Christ is rightly called the ?Prince of Peace.? (Isaiah 9:6) But he is not a pacifist. He has already fought a war in heaven to clear it of all God?s rebellious enemies. (Revelation 12:7-9) Soon he will fight another war ?to bring to ruin those ruining the earth.? However, his followers on earth will take no part in that divine judgment.Revelation 11:17, 18.

    True Christians love peace. They stay completely neutral in the world?s military, political, and ethnic conflicts. But, strictly speaking, they are not pacifists. Why? Because they welcome God?s war that will finally enforce his will on eartha war that will settle the great issue of universal sovereignty and rid the earth of all enemies of peace once and for all.Jeremiah 25:31-33; Daniel 2:44; Matthew 6:9, 10.

    *******************************************


    *** w51 2/1 pp. 67-73 Why Jehovah?s Witnesses Are Not Pacifists ***
    Why Jehovah?s Witnesses Are Not Pacifists

    ?Jehovah is a man of war: Jehovah is his name.?Ex. 15:3, AS; Yg.
    ?JEHOVAH?S witnesses! Just a bunch of pacifists!? So a great many people will exclaim with scorn. And so they have been led to think by the charges hurled at these by their enemies. But are the witnesses pacifists, seeking refuge under the cover of ?conscientious objection? because they are afraid to fight? Let us here honestly search for the right and fair answer to this hot question. What have they to say for themselves?

    2 At the 1950 international assembly of Jehovah?s witnesses in Yankee Stadium, New York city, 10,000 foreign delegates were there from more than sixty other lands. Most of these had been subjected to great religious discrimination, embarrassment, hardship and inconvenience because they were obliged to clear themselves of the false charge of ?extreme pacifism?. An indignation meeting was held Friday afternoon, August 4, at the assembly, at which the 70,000 American delegates in the presence of these foreign brothers unanimously passed a ?Regret and Protest?, and at the close of the afternoon?s session a million copies of this were distributed. This 4-page paper vigorously called attention to the ?Discrimination on False Charge of Pacifism? and said: ?The smearing of us as extreme pacifists is without foundation and is a deliberate lie to provoke prejudice against us and this international assembly. They have done as the Scriptures prophesied, ?framed mischief by law.?Psalm 94:20. Extreme pacifism is not our preachment. We are not pacifists. . . . To charge that we are extreme pacifists is a lie.?

    3 As defined by Webster?s New International Dictionary (2d edition, unabridged, of 1943) pacifism means: ?Opposition to war or to the use of military force for any purpose; especially, an attitude of mind opposing all war, emphasizing the defects of military training and cost of war, and advocating settlement of international disputes entirely by arbitration.? Such pacifism not even the Bible itself can be charged with teaching, and neither can Jehovah?s witnesses, who stick most scrupulously to the Bible.

    4 When expressing a judgment upon Jehovah?s witnesses people are inclined to think of them as a religious body less than a century old. True, this unique name came into the limelight in 1931, when, by public acclamation, these faithful Christians all over the earth adopted resolutions rejecting the contemptuous names the enemies had tagged onto them and accepting the Scriptural name ?Jehovah?s witnesses?. But their history is much longer than a century. Already in the eighth century before Christ the prophecy declared to God?s chosen people: ?Ye are my witnesses, saith Jehovah, and my servant whom I have chosen; . . . I have declared, and I have saved, and I have showed; and there was no strange god among you: therefore ye are my witnesses, saith Jehovah, and I am God.? (Isa. 43:10-12, AS) In fact, the history of Jehovah?s witnesses runs all the way back to Adam?s son Abel, whom his brother Cain killed because Abel had received favorable witness from Jehovah God. The apostle Paul, in chapters 11 and 12 of his letter to the Hebrews, shows that fact. In all that history of almost six thousand years the record fails to show Jehovah?s witnesses accusable of ?opposition to war or to the use of military force for any purpose?, which is the definition of pacifism.

    5 We could go through the list of Jehovah?s witnesses from Abraham onward to show they were not pacifists. The apostle Paul tells us about Abraham ?returning from the slaughter of the kings? and receiving the blessing of King Melchizedek. (Heb. 7:1-4; Gen. 14:14-21) He tells of Moses who led the Israelites to the borders of the Promised Land. Then he mentions one high light in Joshua?s war to purge the Promised Land of the immoral pagan inhabitants, and adds: ?And what more shall I say? For the time will fail me if I go on to relate about Gideon, Barak, Samson, Jephthah, David as well as Samuel and the other prophets, who through faith defeated kingdoms in conflict, effected righteousness, obtained promises, stopped the mouths of lions, stayed the force of fire, escaped the edge of the sword, from a weak state were made powerful, became valiant in war, routed the armies of foreigners.? (Heb. 11:30-34, NW) Every one that Paul there names was a fighter. Jehovah gave them victory. Only because Jerusalem proved unfaithful to God after repeated warnings by his witnesses Jehovah yielded the Jews over to the Babylonian armies and did not fight for them. He had forewarned them of punishment for disobedience, and so he let that come upon them in vindication of his word.Deut. 28:36-67.
    NEHEMIAH, MORDECAI AND ESTHER FIGHTERS

    6 Seventy years the Jews or Israelites were exiles in Babylonian provinces. Did they join the armies of Babylon and fight for its world domination? No; although some Jews, like Daniel and his three Hebrew companions, were taken into the governmental service in spite of their conscientious worship of Jehovah God. Government servants of high rank those three Hebrews might be, yet they refused to violate their conscience and bend to Emperor Nebuchadnezzar?s decree and commit idolatry, saluting the image of the political state, the golden image which the dictatorial ruler had set up for united worship by all elements of his empire. (Dan. 3:1-30) When Babylon was overthrown, the captive Israelites were not mixed in with Babylon?s armies fighting against its overthrow. They knew Jehovah?s prophecies had foretold its overthrow, and so why fight against fulfillment of divine prophecy, and for an oppressive world power at that?

    7 Under the new rule of the victorious Medes and Persians the aged Daniel was taken into the government service of King Darius the Mede. He became the leading president of all the king?s satraps. When the jealous enemies could find no occasion against Daniel except in his faithful obedience to the law of his God Jehovah, then they framed mischief against him by law. Though faced with being thrown into the lions? den, and with his governmental office at stake, Daniel refused to violate his conscience. He did not bow to the imperial law which was against praying to Jehovah and required everybody to look to the political state for everything. Daniel rendered to the emperor only what belonged to him, but to God the worship and obedience that belonged to him. God shut the lions? mouths for him, but those who framed mischief against him by crafty law were themselves thrown to the lions.Dan. 6:1-28.

    8 Cyrus the Persian succeeded Darius as ruler. In his first year the captive Jews were let return to the site of Jerusalem and rebuild Jehovah?s temple. They did not have to fight for their liberation by force of military arms, but Almighty God restored them for his name?s sake and because they repented and devoted themselves to his worship. But even after this restoration to their homeland the Jews did not become pacifists.

    9 This fact is noteworthy in the case of Nehemiah. He was a Jew in governmental service as cupbearer and close consultant of the Persian king Ahasuerus. He was made governor of the Jewish province in Palestine and was sent to build good walls for the restored city of Jerusalem. The pagan enemies accused Nehemiah of trying to secede from the empire. ?And they conspired all of them together to come and fight against Jerusalem, and to cause confusion therein.? What action did Nehemiah take? He did not leave God out of consideration, because he knew that ?except Jehovah keep the city, the watchman waketh but in vain?. (Ps. 127:1, AS) So the record informs us: ?But we made our prayer unto our God, and set a watch against them day and night, because of them. . . . And I looked, and rose up, and said unto the nobles, and to the rulers, and to the rest of the people, Be not ye afraid of them: remember the Lord, who is great and terrible, and fight for your brethren, your sons, and your daughters, your wives, and your houses.? From then on the builders carried on construction of the wall armed with spears, shields, bows, coats of mail, and swords girded at their side. The conspiracy was thus foiled. (Neh. 4:8-23, AS) God?s cause was involved and the liberty of his people to worship him freely. That was why those Israelites had chosen to fight. It was not for the glory and power of the Persian empire that they fought. They fought for their brothers who belonged to God?s organization and who worshiped him.

    10 In other provinces of the Persian empire there was also no pacifism on the part of the Jews. Over sixty years after the restoration of a Jewish remnant to Jerusalem the Jews throughout the empire were accused by a religious enemy in high governmental position. They were different from all other people; besides the law of the empire they had Jehovah?s laws governing their worship of God. So the wicked enemy Haman said: ?Their laws are diverse from those of every people; neither keep they the king?s laws: therefore it is not for the king?s profit to suffer them.? And he requested and got a law passed to have them destroyed before ever another passover rolled around.Esther 3:8-15, AS.

    11 Under the counsel of Mordecai the Jew, Queen Esther carried a legal fight to the highest judicial figure of the empire, King Ahasuerus himself. At the risk of her own life she pleaded for relief for her people, at the same time exposing the mischievous designs of their religious enemy Haman. This wicked persecutor was hanged on gallows he had built for Mordecai, and Mordecai was advanced to higher office in the Persian government. By authority of the emperor he wrote a law into the government statutes, providing for the Jews on the fixed day of assault by their foes ?to gather themselves together, and to stand for their life, to destroy, to slay, and to cause to perish, all the power of the people and province that would assault them, their little ones and women?. Did the Jews pacifistically refuse to act upon this law for their self-defense by force of arms? No! On the 13th and 14th days of their last month Adar, they fought valiantly for the defense of their own lives and those of their brothers. Jehovah God was with them in this and handed them the victory and fulfilled his own prophetic command to have the Amalekites wiped out to a man. The Jews, his witnesses, he used as his executioners.Esther 8:10 to 9:16; Ex. 17:13-16, AS.

    NO SHIFT TO PACIFISM AT THE WORLD?S END

    12 Many of our readers or public officials may ask: If Jehovah?s witnesses of today are linked up in one unbroken chain with those witnesses of ancient times with such a history, why is it that they do not carry out this tradition of military combat? Why are they not found in the ranks of the armies of Christendom? Why do they seek exemption from military service? Why do they go so far as even to refuse to enter the Public Service camps maintained for or by pacifists and conscientious objectors, or take any part in the defense or war effort? Ask Jehovah?s witnesses why, and they will tell you it is not because they have turned pacifist. It is because they have conscientious objection to taking part in such war and defense efforts of Christendom and the rest of the world, their objection being based on God?s Word, the Bible. But, you ask, how can they be conscientious objectors and not at the same time pacifists? They are not against war between the nations, and they do not interfere with the war efforts of the nations nor with anyone who can conscientiously join in such efforts. They fight only when God commands them to do so, because then it is theocratic warfare.

    13 Were Jehovah?s witnesses today to claim to be pacifists, it would mean for them to denounce all the pre-Christian witnesses of Jehovah who took up arms to uphold Jehovah?s universal sovereignty and his theocratic nation of Israel. But this denunciation we cannot make. Jesus Christ never did so, and he is Jehovah?s greatest witness, who has earned the title ?The faithful and true witness?. (Rev. 3:14) Jehovah himself is no pacifist. Neither are his witnesses such, although they are conscientious objectors. Jesus was no pacifist, although there is no record that he ever took up carnal weapons in self-defense. Ah, you say, but did not Jesus make a whip of cords to drive all the commercial venders from the temple at Jerusalem? Yes, but the record does not say he used this whip on the men who were doing the selling but he used it upon their sheep and cattle which they had brought into that sacred place, ?making the house of my Father a house of merchandise.?John 2:13-16, NW.

    14 Again you object, Did not Jesus, after setting up the Memorial with his disciples, tell them before going out to Gethsemane, ?Let the one having no sword sell his outer garment and buy one?? And when his disciples said, ?Master, look! here are two swords,? he said to them, ?It is enough.? (Luke 22:36-38, NW) Yes; but by this Jesus indicated to them that he was to be seized by an armed band, under circumstances which could provoke armed resistance. The facts that developed showed Jesus did not resort to a sword when his illegal arrest came. Why, then, did he suggest getting a sword and let at least one sword be taken along to Gethsemane? He did it to show that he chose not to resort to armed resistance but would give himself up voluntarily in harmony with his Father?s will. Peter tried to put up armed resistance, used the sword and struck off a man?s ear. Then Jesus said to Peter: ?Return your sword to its place, for all those who take the sword will perish by the sword. Or do you think that I cannot appeal to my Father to supply me at this moment more than twelve legions of angels? In that case, how would the Scriptures be fulfilled that it must take place this way?? (Matt. 26:52-54, NW) According to John?s account Jesus added: ?The cup that the Father has given me, should I not by all means drink it?? (John 18:11, NW) So we see why Jesus acted in a way that to some seems like pacifism. He was, however, not going before his Father?s court or before the courts of the land on a charge of armed resistance. He did not expose himself to being killed under armed resistance; he must die willingly, sacrificially, like a lamb led to slaughter.

    CONSISTENT WITH PROPHECY AND THEIR MESSAGE

    15 Jehovah?s witnesses copy Jesus and obey his instructions. That is why they have not joined worldly armies and taken part in the war efforts of the nations in any way. This does not mean they are pacifists opposed to war and resisting it and interfering with worldly governments in prosecuting wars of aggression or of defense. They could not be war-resisters, for they submit to the fulfillment of Jesus? words concerning the consummation of this system of things. Asked by his disciples, ?Tell us, When will these things be, and what will be the sign of your presence and of the consummation of the system of things?? he told them: ?You are going to hear of wars and reports of wars; see that you are not terrified. For these things must take place, but the accomplished end is not yet. For nation will rise against nation and kingdom against kingdom, and there will be food shortages and earthquakes in one place after another. All these things are a beginning of pangs of distress.? (Matt. 24:3, 6-8, NW) So how could the Christian witnesses of Jehovah oppose worldly wars or try to prevent them since Jesus prophesied that they were certain to be fought? Jesus did not tell them they would be in the fighting. They would merely hear the wars being fought within their earshot or else hear the reports about the wars fought elsewhere.

    16 Were Jehovah?s witnesses today to be pacifists, then, to be consistent, they would have to oppose Jehovah?s war against the Devil?s entire world at the battle front of Armageddon. They have seen the nations of this world assault God?s visible organization of his people, prophetically spoken of as ?Jerusalem?, during the world war of 1914-1918, as foretold by Zechariah. Now they look for the rest of his prophecy to be carried out shortly, namely: ?Then shall Jehovah go forth, and fight against those nations, as when he fought in the day of battle. . . . Jehovah my God shall come, and all the holy ones with thee. . . . And Jehovah shall be King over all the earth: in that day shall Jehovah be one, and his name one.? (Zech. 14:1-3, 5-9, AS) There will be a great slaughter then, foreshadowed by the slaughter of God?s united enemies who were marching to the attack on Jerusalem in the days of King Jehoshaphat. Hence he calls the field of slaughter ?the valley of Jehoshaphat? and invites all the nations of this world to come down into it. (2 Chron. 20:1-25) He issues the command:

    17 ?Proclaim ye this among the nations; prepare war; stir up the mighty men; let all the men of war draw near, let them come up. Beat your plowshares into swords, and your pruning-hooks into spears: let the weak say, I am strong. Haste ye, and come, all ye nations round about, and gather yourselves together: thither cause thy mighty ones to come down, O Jehovah. Let the nations bestir themselves, and come up to the valley of Jehoshaphat; for there will I sit to judge all the nations round about. Put ye in the sickle; for the harvest is ripe: come, tread ye; for the winepress is full, the vats overflow; for their wickedness is great. Multitudes, multitudes in the valley of decision! for the day of Jehovah is near in the valley of decision. The sun and the moon are darkened, and the stars withdraw their shining. And Jehovah will roar from Zion, and utter his voice from Jerusalem; and the heavens and the earth shall shake: but Jehovah will be a refuge unto his people.?Joel 3:9-16, AS.

    18 Jehovah?s witnesses of today are the ones commanded to make this proclamation to the nations, and this they are doing. So how could they do this and at the same time be pacifists?

    19 By his acts since A.D. 1914 Jesus Christ could never be accused of being a pacifist. Why not? Because since that date Satan the Devil and his demons have been cast out of heaven and he has come down to our earth with great wrath, knowing that now he has a short time. The unspeakable woes today smiting earth and sea, coupled with all the other fulfillments of prophecy, prove this fact. How was Satan hurled down here? Revelation 12:1-12 answers that after the birth of God?s kingdom and the enthronement of his Son Jesus Christ ?war broke out in heaven?. No pacifist, it was this King Jesus Christ who battled against Satan and his demons and hurled them down to his footstool, the earth. Now the humiliated Satan is using his demons to drive all the nations to Armageddon for the ?war of the great day of God the Almighty?. (Rev. 16:14-16, NW) But who are Jehovah?s ?mighty ones? whom Jehovah brings down to the ?valley of decision? in order to settle forever the paramount issue of world domination? They are the ?Lamb of God? and the angels who fought under him in the ?war in heaven? against Satan. On earth this lamblike One looked like a pacifist, but now he is the ?Lion of the tribe of Judah?. (Rev. 5:5, 6) To this fearless warrior Psalm 110:4-6 (AS) says: ?The Lord at thy right hand will strike through kings in the day of his wrath. He will judge among the nations, he will fill the places with dead bodies; he will strike through the head in many countries.? Read the graphic description of this royal warrior of Jehovah God, at Revelation 19:11-16. Let all the militarized nations know that they will all meet lasting defeat in that universal war of Armageddon and the armaments race will be at last halted for all time.

    20 After Armageddon those who have survived on the winner?s side, Jehovah?s side, will enjoy a perfectly guaranteed peace. Then they will ?beat their swords into plowshares, and their spears into pruninghooks: nation shall not lift up sword against nation, neither shall they learn war any more?.Isa. 2:4.


    ***

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit