a jw poster says:
"JWs do not have to ridgedly stay by the meaning as is presented"
##########
I agree with the jw 110%, but there is one little problem and that is this rule would only apply if the WT Editorial Staff offered a disclaimer such as : The following info is the opinion of the Writers of the WT corp"
you see the wt doesn't present things as the opinion of me or the guesses of men instead it is presented as food from god himself
and to back it up, they will df anyone who disagrees with them
what the poster is describing is known as doing BIBLE COMMENTARY or offering ones own thoughts on what something may or may not mean , therefore allowing one to come back in 5 yrs and say ,well i was wrong, and but i think that this is correct
the wt presents such teaching as:
1 Who the king of the North is AS A FACT NOT TO BE DISPUTED,
2 the wt presented that having oral sex was a violation of gods will punishible by dfing,
3. the wt presented that alternative service was against the will of god punishible by dfing
4. transplants were presented as a violation of the will of god punishible by dfing
what the wt did was attempt to create NEW SINS, yes to violate any of the above was to be sinning against god
yet the day this info rolled off the presses in brooklyn it was wrong
this jw like so many others try to DOWN PLAY just how this information was presented to the jw and the world of mankind-
it was NOT PRESENTED AS MERELY AN OPINION, A GUESS, A PERSONAL INTERPETATION, BUT AS FOOD FROM GOD HIMSELF
in other words the Editorial staff of the wt signed gods name to a chk that bounced
what the when one is presenting something as a