hillbilly
re: what are you doing on new year's eve?
dec 31, 2002 10:03
My mare of 26 years died last January..she was registered Saddlebred, and BEAUTIFUL..
She was with me since I was a teenager.
MANY wonderful memories, growing up together!
She used to look at each new guy in my life speculatively; like "I've seen 'em come, I've seen 'em go..."
I miss her so much.
MY RESTLESS LADY-my beautiful girl!
1979-2005
i know that this question must of been asked before, but i wasn't here when it was asked.
so, i'm asking again.
how do you get by when you're stressed to the point of no return?
i walk (a lot) and i pray...
God meets me there.
according to our new co, elders nor their children are allowed to go to college.
my dad is being deleted.
evidently new material was presented at the elder school.
heaven FORBID you learn independent thinking.....
---stories like this make my trigger finger twitch.
boy's web cam opens portal to a grim worldby kurt eichenwald the new york times .
monday, december 19, 2005. .
this is an amazing article.
kdn
...big brass band...
...slinky black dress.....
...good champagne !
kdn
note: the catholic molestation cases have mostly been evaluated under employment law theories not the tort of misrepresentation or under non-fraud related tort claims]; fails to address important legal considerations such as standing and statute of limitations; and finally and most importantly, the essay fails to address in any meaningful way the inevitable constitutional arguments that would be raised by opposing (watchtower) counsel.
supreme court justices do not have the time to browse through law journals and the implication that they would be interested in an essay is even more deceptive.
the society does not cite a 1960 study as evidence that blood transfusions are hazardous.. here is the actual quotation in context:.
whohoooo
I'm a hero!
kd norris
note: the catholic molestation cases have mostly been evaluated under employment law theories not the tort of misrepresentation or under non-fraud related tort claims]; fails to address important legal considerations such as standing and statute of limitations; and finally and most importantly, the essay fails to address in any meaningful way the inevitable constitutional arguments that would be raised by opposing (watchtower) counsel.
supreme court justices do not have the time to browse through law journals and the implication that they would be interested in an essay is even more deceptive.
the society does not cite a 1960 study as evidence that blood transfusions are hazardous.. here is the actual quotation in context:.
"any legal attack of the Society itself is going to be met with the full brunt and fiscal power of a cadre of Watchtower lawyers who will bury the plaintiff’s counsel with paperwork, pre-trial motions, discovery requests, etc. Even Erin Brockovich would feel like Dorothy in the Watchtower’s tornado. -"
This, in and of its self, is not a reason to fail to pursue legal action.....
I've done it, and I'm no Dorothy.
In my opinion, the blood issue will require a case-by-case analysis, as did/does child sexual abuse cases, notwithstanding the constitutional issues.
Kimberlee D Norris
attorney at law
Check your email...
kdn
.
the name was suggested by someone who posts here, since it is not really a disassociation letter.
here, for your criticism pleasure, is my "un"association letter..
Good job, Auld...
Should provoke some thought...
kimberlee d.
i'd just like to say that i believe barbara's a wonderful addition to this site and i appreciate all her contributions in her pursuit to expose the watchtower's deceit.
Auld-
If it comes to a leg-wrestle, i think i can take him....
Swalker-
Didn't mean my post as finger-pointing, just venting...
