Sorry to disagree, but in all my time as an elder no elder body that I was a part of EVER disfellowshipped anyone without a Judical Committe.
What they do is inform the BOE that sufficient evidence of wrong doing exists. The BOE appoints a JC. The JC is supposed to contact the individual. If the
individual AGREES to meet, this is taken as evidence that the individual feels like he is still under the authority of the congregation. If after agreeing he does not meet
with the JC, some brothers still go ahead with a meeting, and if there is enough evidence--- the usaul 2 witness rule---- they will disfellowship the individual becuase:
1. He felt himself under the authority of the congregation
2. THere was in fact evidence of wrongdoing
3. The individual was unrepentent, demonstrated by his actions and especially the action of NOT meeting when once agreeing to do so.
Of course, not all elders follow this, which is why disfellowshippings are often overturned if appealled.
If a person, however, is an apostate--- attends a church of "Babylon the Great" and it is public knowledge---- that in itself is evidence of wrongdoing for a JW JC. They still have to fo through the procedure, though apostacy is treated in JW land as wickedness and not weakness.
Zack----- of the will never agree to a JC class